P-1588. Effect of Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) versus Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MF) on Time to Optimal Therapy in Patients with Positive Blood Cultures

Abstract Background Rapid diagnostic technology is an important tool that can be used to optimize antimicrobial therapy for patients with bloodstream infections Several technologies for rapid organism identification exist including matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The primary objective is to compare time to optimal antimicrobial therapy with MALDI-TOF MS vs multiplex PCR rapid diagnostic systems for patients with positive blood cultures. Methods This multicenter, retrospective, cohort study included patients with a positive blood culture and identification via MALDI-TOF MS (June 1st – June 7th, 2021) compared to multiplex PCR (June 1st – June 7th, 2022). Patients were excluded if expired or discharged before organism identification, transferred from an outside hospital with a positive blood culture, if rapid diagnostics not performed, if identified pathogen had no defined optimal therapy per system guidelines or polymicrobial infection. The primary outcome was time to optimal therapy (TTOT). Secondary outcomes included time to effective therapy (TTET), length of stay, and clinical failure defined as recurrence of bacteremia within 30 days or in-hospital mortality. Results A total of 221 patients were included (MALDI-TOF MS = 117; multiplex PCR = 104). Utilization of multiplex PCR compared to MALDI-TOF MS significantly reduced overall TTOT (21.1 hours vs 41.1 hours, p < 0.01). This significant reduction in TTOT with multiplex PCR was observed with gram-negative bacteremia (4 hours vs 37 hours, p < 0.01) and gram-positive bacteremia (17.8 hours vs 41.1 hours, p < 0.01) but was not statistically significant for blood cultures deemed contaminants (42 hours vs 43.5 hours, p=0.58). TTET was improved for multiplex PCR although not statistically significant (1.5 hours vs 7.5 hours, p=0.06). No differences were observed for clinical failure or hospital length of stay. Conclusion Multiplex PCR significantly decreased time to optimal antimicrobial therapy when compared to MALDI-TOF MS for patients with positive blood cultures. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1755
Primary Topic
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1588. Effect of Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) versus Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MF) on Time to Optimal Therapy in Patients with Positive Blood Cultures

Jill Argotsinger, Victoria Gavaghan, Alexandria Baum, Jessica L. Miller
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
article

P-1588. Effect of Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) versus Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MF) on Time to Optimal Therapy in Patients with Positive Blood Cultures

Jill Argotsinger, Victoria Gavaghan, Alexandria Baum, Jessica L. Miller
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Rapid diagnostic technology is an important tool that can be used to optimize antimicrobial therapy for patients with bloodstream infections Several technologies for rapid organism identification exist including matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The primary objective is to compare time to optimal antimicrobial therapy with MALDI-TOF MS vs multiplex PCR rapid diagnostic systems for patients with positive blood cultures. Methods This multicenter, retrospective, cohort study included patients with a positive blood culture and identification via MALDI-TOF MS (June 1st – June 7th, 2021) compared to multiplex PCR (June 1st – June 7th, 2022). Patients were excluded if expired or discharged before organism identification, transferred from an outside hospital with a positive blood culture, if rapid diagnostics not performed, if identified pathogen had no defined optimal therapy per system guidelines or polymicrobial infection. The primary outcome was time to optimal therapy (TTOT). Secondary outcomes included time to effective therapy (TTET), length of stay, and clinical failure defined as recurrence of bacteremia within 30 days or in-hospital mortality. Results A total of 221 patients were included (MALDI-TOF MS = 117; multiplex PCR = 104). Utilization of multiplex PCR compared to MALDI-TOF MS significantly reduced overall TTOT (21.1 hours vs 41.1 hours, p < 0.01). This significant reduction in TTOT with multiplex PCR was observed with gram-negative bacteremia (4 hours vs 37 hours, p < 0.01) and gram-positive bacteremia (17.8 hours vs 41.1 hours, p < 0.01) but was not statistically significant for blood cultures deemed contaminants (42 hours vs 43.5 hours, p=0.58). TTET was improved for multiplex PCR although not statistically significant (1.5 hours vs 7.5 hours, p=0.06). No differences were observed for clinical failure or hospital length of stay. Conclusion Multiplex PCR significantly decreased time to optimal antimicrobial therapy when compared to MALDI-TOF MS for patients with positive blood cultures. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Advocate Lutheran General Hospital (US), Advocate Health Care (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.