P-1929. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Risk Factors and Outcomes Associated with Candidemia

Abstract Background Cases of candidemia surged during the COVID-19 pandemic, possibly due to the intensive treatments used in critically ill patients. This study aims to explore the impact of the pandemic on risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with candidemia. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients ≥ 18 years diagnosed with candidemia at a single facility in Albany, Georgia, between January 2017 and May 2023. Patients were categorized into three groups based on their COVID-19 status and admission date (January 21, 2020, marking the first US case): 1) pre-pandemic (before January 21, 2020), 2) pandemic with COVID-19 (after January 21, 2020), and 3) pandemic without COVID-19 (after January 21, 2020). We compared risk factors for candidemia and in-hospital mortality across these groups. Results A total of 89 patients were included, with 44% pre-pandemic and 56% during the pandemic (half with COVID-19) (Table 1). Baseline characteristics were similar, except for a higher median number of comorbidities in the pre-pandemic group (p=0.008). Notably, the COVID-19 group had a significantly higher proportion of patients with no comorbidities (12%) compared to the pre-pandemic (0%) and pandemic without COVID-19 (4%) groups (p=0.01). Patients with COVID-19 were predominantly diagnosed with candidemia in the ICU (92%) compared to pre-pandemic (49%) and pandemic without COVID-19 (44%) groups (p< 0.001). Additionally, mechanical ventilation and vascular catheters were more frequent in the COVID-19 group (88% and 96%, respectively) compared to the pre-pandemic (31% and 62%) and pandemic without COVID-19 (40% and 68%) groups (p< 0.001 for both) (Table 2). While immunosuppressive medications were uncommon, glucocorticoid use was significantly higher in the COVID-19 group (76%) compared to the pre-pandemic (18%) and pandemic without COVID-19 (24%) groups (p=0.008). In-hospital mortality was highest among patients with COVID-19 (76%) compared to patients before the pandemic (44%) and those without COVID-19 during the pandemic (32%) (p< 0.005). Conclusion Patients with COVID-19 displayed a higher prevalence of candidemia risk factors and significantly worse clinical outcomes, including higher in-hospital mortality, compared to the other groups. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.2089
Primary Topic
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1929. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Risk Factors and Outcomes Associated with Candidemia

Rachael A. Clark, Xianyan Chen, Daniel B. Chastain, Austin Dykes et al.
1 links
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
article

P-1929. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Risk Factors and Outcomes Associated with Candidemia

Rachael A. Clark, Xianyan Chen, Daniel B. Chastain, Austin Dykes, Shiyuan Deng, Andrés Martínez, Melat Endashaw, Laila Warrayat
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Cases of candidemia surged during the COVID-19 pandemic, possibly due to the intensive treatments used in critically ill patients. This study aims to explore the impact of the pandemic on risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with candidemia. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients ≥ 18 years diagnosed with candidemia at a single facility in Albany, Georgia, between January 2017 and May 2023. Patients were categorized into three groups based on their COVID-19 status and admission date (January 21, 2020, marking the first US case): 1) pre-pandemic (before January 21, 2020), 2) pandemic with COVID-19 (after January 21, 2020), and 3) pandemic without COVID-19 (after January 21, 2020). We compared risk factors for candidemia and in-hospital mortality across these groups. Results A total of 89 patients were included, with 44% pre-pandemic and 56% during the pandemic (half with COVID-19) (Table 1). Baseline characteristics were similar, except for a higher median number of comorbidities in the pre-pandemic group (p=0.008). Notably, the COVID-19 group had a significantly higher proportion of patients with no comorbidities (12%) compared to the pre-pandemic (0%) and pandemic without COVID-19 (4%) groups (p=0.01). Patients with COVID-19 were predominantly diagnosed with candidemia in the ICU (92%) compared to pre-pandemic (49%) and pandemic without COVID-19 (44%) groups (p< 0.001). Additionally, mechanical ventilation and vascular catheters were more frequent in the COVID-19 group (88% and 96%, respectively) compared to the pre-pandemic (31% and 62%) and pandemic without COVID-19 (40% and 68%) groups (p< 0.001 for both) (Table 2). While immunosuppressive medications were uncommon, glucocorticoid use was significantly higher in the COVID-19 group (76%) compared to the pre-pandemic (18%) and pandemic without COVID-19 (24%) groups (p=0.008). In-hospital mortality was highest among patients with COVID-19 (76%) compared to patients before the pandemic (44%) and those without COVID-19 during the pandemic (32%) (p< 0.005). Conclusion Patients with COVID-19 displayed a higher prevalence of candidemia risk factors and significantly worse clinical outcomes, including higher in-hospital mortality, compared to the other groups. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Emory Healthcare (US), Georgia College & State University (US), University of Georgia (US), Baptist Medical Center Jacksonville (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), Franklin College (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.