P-68. Comparison of vancomycin vs daptomycin for prosthetic joint infections

Abstract Background A combination of surgery and extended durations of antimicrobials are the mainstays of therapy for patients with prosthetic joint infections (PJI). In the Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of PJI, daptomycin is an ‘alternative regimen’ for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and other methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) species. The side effect profile of daptomycin may also be more tolerable than that of vancomycin, the preferred agent. This study aims to investigate the tolerability and efficacy of vancomycin versus that of daptomycin for patients with PJI. This topic has not been widely compared in literature for patients with monomicrobial PJIs. Methods This was a retrospective, observational assessment of patients who received vancomycin or daptomycin after surgery for prosthetic knee or hip infections. Patients were followed in our University Hospital’s Orthopedic Infectious Diseases Clinic between 1/1/2019 and 4/30/2023. Medical records were reviewed including demographics, type of surgery, adverse effects (AEs), and relapse rates at 6 weeks, 6 months, and one year. Results Seventy-nine patients were included: 56 initiated therapy with vancomycin and 23 with daptomycin. The primary outcome was the incidence of therapy-altering AEs. Twenty-two patients in the vancomycin group and 4 patients in the daptomycin group experienced AEs that led to therapy changes (39.3% vs 26.1%, p=0.07). The secondary outcome was the incidence of recurrent infection and was tracked in a subset of 39 vancomycin and 23 daptomycin patients. At 1 year, 10 vancomycin patients required additional unplanned surgery, while only 1 daptomycin patient experienced this (17.9% vs 4.3%, p=0.04). The only statistically significant difference found in baseline characteristics was that more antibiotic spacers were placed in the long-term follow-up daptomycin patients (15 vs 16, p=0.034). Conclusion There was no statistically significant difference in tolerating vancomycin vs daptomycin, however, daptomycin may lead to fewer relapses long-term in patients with MRSA and CoNS infections. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.275
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-68. Comparison of vancomycin vs daptomycin for prosthetic joint infections

Allison Lastinger, Douglas Slain, Meera Mehta, Jessica Johnson et al.
11 links
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
article

P-68. Comparison of vancomycin vs daptomycin for prosthetic joint infections

Allison Lastinger, Douglas Slain, Meera Mehta, Jessica Johnson, Carissa Tedeschi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background A combination of surgery and extended durations of antimicrobials are the mainstays of therapy for patients with prosthetic joint infections (PJI). In the Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of PJI, daptomycin is an ‘alternative regimen’ for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and other methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) species. The side effect profile of daptomycin may also be more tolerable than that of vancomycin, the preferred agent. This study aims to investigate the tolerability and efficacy of vancomycin versus that of daptomycin for patients with PJI. This topic has not been widely compared in literature for patients with monomicrobial PJIs. Methods This was a retrospective, observational assessment of patients who received vancomycin or daptomycin after surgery for prosthetic knee or hip infections. Patients were followed in our University Hospital’s Orthopedic Infectious Diseases Clinic between 1/1/2019 and 4/30/2023. Medical records were reviewed including demographics, type of surgery, adverse effects (AEs), and relapse rates at 6 weeks, 6 months, and one year. Results Seventy-nine patients were included: 56 initiated therapy with vancomycin and 23 with daptomycin. The primary outcome was the incidence of therapy-altering AEs. Twenty-two patients in the vancomycin group and 4 patients in the daptomycin group experienced AEs that led to therapy changes (39.3% vs 26.1%, p=0.07). The secondary outcome was the incidence of recurrent infection and was tracked in a subset of 39 vancomycin and 23 daptomycin patients. At 1 year, 10 vancomycin patients required additional unplanned surgery, while only 1 daptomycin patient experienced this (17.9% vs 4.3%, p=0.04). The only statistically significant difference found in baseline characteristics was that more antibiotic spacers were placed in the long-term follow-up daptomycin patients (15 vs 16, p=0.034). Conclusion There was no statistically significant difference in tolerating vancomycin vs daptomycin, however, daptomycin may lead to fewer relapses long-term in patients with MRSA and CoNS infections. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
West Virginia University (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), West Virginia University Hospitals (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.