P-959. Evaluation of Online Medical Education to Improve Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Knowledge and Competency among Providers

Abstract Background Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use for HIV prevention remains low among Black women in the U.S. compared to their need. Barriers to uptake include provider discomfort prescribing PrEP to this group. We sought to evaluate the impact of medical education on providers’ knowledge and attitudes toward PrEP among Black women. Methods Providers at two community health centers in Florida and Illinois participated in a live, online PrEP training and completed an online pre- and post-test. The training lasted 45-60 minutes and included didactic and interactive content to equip providers with the clinical knowledge for prescribing PrEP (e.g., indications/side effects, PrEP during pregnancy/breast-feeding, maintenance of therapy) while building their competency discussing PrEP with Black women (e.g., culturally-competent and “health-based” rather than “risk-based” scripts). The test evaluated objective knowledge of PrEP, attitudes toward PrEP and discussing PrEP with/prescribing PrEP to Black women, and likelihood of prescribing PrEP in the future. Data were analyzed descriptively. Results Nineteen providers completed the pre-test and fifteen providers completed the post-test. Most were physicians or nurse practitioners (68%, 13/19 and 80%, 12/15, respectively) and female (63%, 12/19 and 60%, 9/15, respectively). In the pre-test, 32% (6/19) of participants thought that pregnant women should not use PrEP; 100% (15/15) of post-test participants understood that PrEP was safe during pregnancy. In terms of discussing PrEP with Black women, originally 53% (10/19) of participants rated their comfort level as “Poor” or “Fair”, which fell to 13% (2/15) after the training. In the pre-test, 47% (9/19) of participants rated their comfort level in prescribing PrEP to Black women as “Poor” or “Fair”, which decreased to 20% (3/15) in the post-test. When asked how likely they were to prescribe PrEP to a Black woman within the next 6 months, 42% (8/19) of participants stated “Likely or “Very Likely” which increased to 80% (12/15) after the training. Conclusion Knowledge of PrEP, comfort discussing PrEP with Black women, and intention to prescribe PrEP all improved post-education. Additional data is needed to evaluate the long-term impact of the training on PrEP uptake among Black women. Disclosures Jessica Ridgway, MD, Gilead Sciences: Expert Testimony

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1149
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-959. Evaluation of Online Medical Education to Improve Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Knowledge and Competency among Providers

Jessica P. Ridgway, Kelly Ducheny, Geoffroy Liégeon, Eleanor E. Friedman et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Delphi Technique in Research
article

P-959. Evaluation of Online Medical Education to Improve Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Knowledge and Competency among Providers

Jessica P. Ridgway, Kelly Ducheny, Geoffroy Liégeon, Eleanor E. Friedman, Samantha A. Devlin, Amy K. Johnson, Nikki Kasal
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use for HIV prevention remains low among Black women in the U.S. compared to their need. Barriers to uptake include provider discomfort prescribing PrEP to this group. We sought to evaluate the impact of medical education on providers’ knowledge and attitudes toward PrEP among Black women. Methods Providers at two community health centers in Florida and Illinois participated in a live, online PrEP training and completed an online pre- and post-test. The training lasted 45-60 minutes and included didactic and interactive content to equip providers with the clinical knowledge for prescribing PrEP (e.g., indications/side effects, PrEP during pregnancy/breast-feeding, maintenance of therapy) while building their competency discussing PrEP with Black women (e.g., culturally-competent and “health-based” rather than “risk-based” scripts). The test evaluated objective knowledge of PrEP, attitudes toward PrEP and discussing PrEP with/prescribing PrEP to Black women, and likelihood of prescribing PrEP in the future. Data were analyzed descriptively. Results Nineteen providers completed the pre-test and fifteen providers completed the post-test. Most were physicians or nurse practitioners (68%, 13/19 and 80%, 12/15, respectively) and female (63%, 12/19 and 60%, 9/15, respectively). In the pre-test, 32% (6/19) of participants thought that pregnant women should not use PrEP; 100% (15/15) of post-test participants understood that PrEP was safe during pregnancy. In terms of discussing PrEP with Black women, originally 53% (10/19) of participants rated their comfort level as “Poor” or “Fair”, which fell to 13% (2/15) after the training. In the pre-test, 47% (9/19) of participants rated their comfort level in prescribing PrEP to Black women as “Poor” or “Fair”, which decreased to 20% (3/15) in the post-test. When asked how likely they were to prescribe PrEP to a Black woman within the next 6 months, 42% (8/19) of participants stated “Likely or “Very Likely” which increased to 80% (12/15) after the training. Conclusion Knowledge of PrEP, comfort discussing PrEP with Black women, and intention to prescribe PrEP all improved post-education. Additional data is needed to evaluate the long-term impact of the training on PrEP uptake among Black women. Disclosures Jessica Ridgway, MD, Gilead Sciences: Expert Testimony

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Lurie Children's Hospital (US), Howard Brown Health Center (US), University of Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Delphi Technique in Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.