P-69. What if? Opportunities for IV to PO Antibiotic Transition in Bone and Joint Infection Treatment

Abstract Background Historically, bone and joint infections have been treated with intravenous (IV) antimicrobials. IV to oral (PO) antibiotic transition implementation differs among institutions and prescribers. This practice has increased in recent years as new literature has demonstrated comparable efficacy of PO and IV treatment. Use of outpatient IV therapy often necessitates using a central line. This introduces additional risks, particularly line-related complications such as clots and central line infections. The purpose of this project was to identify opportunities for transitioning from IV to PO therapy in patients discharged on IV antibiotics for bone/joint infections at an academic medical center. Baseline Patient Characteristics Methods We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional study of adults discharged on IV antibiotics between January 2020 and December 2023. Inclusion criteria included age ≥ 18 years, patient followed by institutional outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy service, and receipt of at least one IV antibiotic for a bone/joint infection. Patients with axial osteomyelitis were excluded. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with the potential to transition from IV to PO antibiotics. Secondary outcomes included incidence of adverse drug events (ADE). Results 324 patients were included. Osteomyelitis was the most common infection (48.5%) followed by joint infection (27.5%). Source control procedures were performed for 83% of patients. Cultures were positive in 75% of patients, and Staphylococcus species were the most common pathogens (45%). In total, 237 (73.1%) of patients qualified for a complete PO regimen. Half of patients (50.3%) received at least one PO antibiotic as part of their discharge therapy. Antibiotic changes occurred after discharge in 15.4% of patients, and 21% of patients experienced an antibiotic associated ADE. Conclusion Most patients discharged on IV antibiotics for bone/joint infection at this medical center could have received a complete PO regimen. While PO antibiotics are not benign, there is the potential to reduce adverse effects. These findings highlight opportunities for IV to PO transition at discharge and the potential to reduce line associated complications. Disclosures Patrick E H Jackson, MD, Gentiva Hospice: spouse employment|Kindred Hospice: spouse employment|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.276
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-69. What if? Opportunities for IV to PO Antibiotic Transition in Bone and Joint Infection Treatment

Corey Medler, Graham Price, Patrick Jackson, Makeisha Dance
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
article

P-69. What if? Opportunities for IV to PO Antibiotic Transition in Bone and Joint Infection Treatment

Corey Medler, Graham Price, Patrick Jackson, Makeisha Dance
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Historically, bone and joint infections have been treated with intravenous (IV) antimicrobials. IV to oral (PO) antibiotic transition implementation differs among institutions and prescribers. This practice has increased in recent years as new literature has demonstrated comparable efficacy of PO and IV treatment. Use of outpatient IV therapy often necessitates using a central line. This introduces additional risks, particularly line-related complications such as clots and central line infections. The purpose of this project was to identify opportunities for transitioning from IV to PO therapy in patients discharged on IV antibiotics for bone/joint infections at an academic medical center. Baseline Patient Characteristics Methods We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional study of adults discharged on IV antibiotics between January 2020 and December 2023. Inclusion criteria included age ≥ 18 years, patient followed by institutional outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy service, and receipt of at least one IV antibiotic for a bone/joint infection. Patients with axial osteomyelitis were excluded. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with the potential to transition from IV to PO antibiotics. Secondary outcomes included incidence of adverse drug events (ADE). Results 324 patients were included. Osteomyelitis was the most common infection (48.5%) followed by joint infection (27.5%). Source control procedures were performed for 83% of patients. Cultures were positive in 75% of patients, and Staphylococcus species were the most common pathogens (45%). In total, 237 (73.1%) of patients qualified for a complete PO regimen. Half of patients (50.3%) received at least one PO antibiotic as part of their discharge therapy. Antibiotic changes occurred after discharge in 15.4% of patients, and 21% of patients experienced an antibiotic associated ADE. Conclusion Most patients discharged on IV antibiotics for bone/joint infection at this medical center could have received a complete PO regimen. While PO antibiotics are not benign, there is the potential to reduce adverse effects. These findings highlight opportunities for IV to PO transition at discharge and the potential to reduce line associated complications. Disclosures Patrick E H Jackson, MD, Gentiva Hospice: spouse employment|Kindred Hospice: spouse employment|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Virginia Commonwealth University (US), University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.