P-868. Evaluating the Clinical Impact of Rapid Diagnostic Testing on Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions

Abstract Background The management of bloodstream infections (BSIs) may be improved with rapid diagnostic identification. The updated Biofire FilmArray blood culture identification (BCID) 2 panel is able to detect extended-spectrum beta-lactamase and additional carbapenemase encoding genes amongst other resistance markers, allowing for earlier antimicrobial stewardship interventions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the time to optimal antimicrobial therapy. Methods This was a single-center retrospective chart review of patients before and after the implementation of the updated BCID panel (BCID1 vs. BCID2, respectively). Adult patients were eligible for inclusion if they had a positive blood culture with an accompanying BCID panel result. Patients were excluded if they received concomitant treatment for an unrelated infection or had monomicrobial BSI with Staphylococcus species. The primary endpoint was time to initiation of optimal antimicrobial therapy from index blood culture, defined as pathogen and resistance gene directed therapy per hospital treatment algorithm. Secondary endpoints included time to active antimicrobial therapy, defined as empiric therapy shown to be active against index isolate(s) with an antimicrobial susceptibility report, and 30-day mortality. Results Overall, 143 patients were included in the BCID1 group and 175 patients in the BCID2 group. Time to optimal antimicrobial therapy was shorter in the BCID2 group compared to the BCID1 group (17.1 hours vs. 29.3 hours; p < 0.05). Time to active therapy was shorter in the BCID2 group compared to the BCID1 group (3.1 hours vs. 5.9 hours; p=0.03). Thirty-day mortality rate was lower in the BCID2 group compared to the BCID1 group (9.7% vs. 20.9%; p < 0.05). Conclusion Time to optimal and active antimicrobial therapy were significantly shorter after the implementation of the BCID2 panel. Furthermore, 30-day mortality was lower, indicating that optimized therapy per local hospital treatment algorithms may improve outcomes. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1059
Primary Topic
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-868. Evaluating the Clinical Impact of Rapid Diagnostic Testing on Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions

Kevin Le, Kady Phe, Todd Michael Lasco, Vincent H. Tam et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
article

P-868. Evaluating the Clinical Impact of Rapid Diagnostic Testing on Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions

Kevin Le, Kady Phe, Todd Michael Lasco, Vincent H. Tam, Andrei Zidaru, Ricky Huynh-Phan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The management of bloodstream infections (BSIs) may be improved with rapid diagnostic identification. The updated Biofire FilmArray blood culture identification (BCID) 2 panel is able to detect extended-spectrum beta-lactamase and additional carbapenemase encoding genes amongst other resistance markers, allowing for earlier antimicrobial stewardship interventions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the time to optimal antimicrobial therapy. Methods This was a single-center retrospective chart review of patients before and after the implementation of the updated BCID panel (BCID1 vs. BCID2, respectively). Adult patients were eligible for inclusion if they had a positive blood culture with an accompanying BCID panel result. Patients were excluded if they received concomitant treatment for an unrelated infection or had monomicrobial BSI with Staphylococcus species. The primary endpoint was time to initiation of optimal antimicrobial therapy from index blood culture, defined as pathogen and resistance gene directed therapy per hospital treatment algorithm. Secondary endpoints included time to active antimicrobial therapy, defined as empiric therapy shown to be active against index isolate(s) with an antimicrobial susceptibility report, and 30-day mortality. Results Overall, 143 patients were included in the BCID1 group and 175 patients in the BCID2 group. Time to optimal antimicrobial therapy was shorter in the BCID2 group compared to the BCID1 group (17.1 hours vs. 29.3 hours; p < 0.05). Time to active therapy was shorter in the BCID2 group compared to the BCID1 group (3.1 hours vs. 5.9 hours; p=0.03). Thirty-day mortality rate was lower in the BCID2 group compared to the BCID1 group (9.7% vs. 20.9%; p < 0.05). Conclusion Time to optimal and active antimicrobial therapy were significantly shorter after the implementation of the BCID2 panel. Furthermore, 30-day mortality was lower, indicating that optimized therapy per local hospital treatment algorithms may improve outcomes. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
St. Luke's Hospital (US), University of Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.