P-1613. Blood Culture Contamination Mitigation: Sustained Stewardship Successes Seen Systemwide

Abstract Background Contamination prevention, when sampling blood for culture, relies on an operator impeccably adhering to skin preparation routines and attentively avoiding cross-contamination opportunities until laboratory personnel attain specimen possession. Operator-reliant diagnostic integrity was challenged throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, which placed unexpected environmental pressures on personnel to the documented detriment of antimicrobial stewardship endeavors and patient outcomes. Clinician interest in shifting some operator burdens to assistive technology subsequently flared; in accordance with literature reports of successful blood culture contamination mitigation when initial-specimen diversion devices were co-opted into protocol, the National Quality Forum and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention backed a Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute revision to blood culture sample collection guidelines, recommending their use. This tech-centric tenet was hypothesized to be necessary to sustaining the successful mitigation of blood culture contamination through the stressor-heavy situations wherein education-focused endeavors alone were struggling to substantiate significance. Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention Outcome Data reflects approximately 36,000 blood cultures drawn each quarter. Methods Intervention began in 2020, prior to which a 3.6% blood culture contamination rate was observed systemwide. Seventeen facilities among nineteen that share a data system co-opted initial-specimen diversion device technology alongside value analysis and cultural curation in a trifurcate strategy to reduce contamination events. Results Consistent, real-time communication with caretakers on outcomes enabled year-over-year interventive technology utilization increases [currently approximately 85% systemwide]. The systemwide blood culture contamination rate for the first quarter of 2024 was 1.64% [586 contamination events among 35,750 total blood cultures], down from 1.9% across 2023, 2.8% across 2022, and 3.2% across 2021. Conclusion Tech-facilitated closure of contaminant pathways, when paired with communication channels connecting individual contributions to stewardship successes, sustained the year-over-year systemwide reduction in blood culture contamination events observed herein. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1780
Primary Topic
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1613. Blood Culture Contamination Mitigation: Sustained Stewardship Successes Seen Systemwide

Mark D. Povroznik
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
article

P-1613. Blood Culture Contamination Mitigation: Sustained Stewardship Successes Seen Systemwide

Mark D. Povroznik
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Contamination prevention, when sampling blood for culture, relies on an operator impeccably adhering to skin preparation routines and attentively avoiding cross-contamination opportunities until laboratory personnel attain specimen possession. Operator-reliant diagnostic integrity was challenged throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, which placed unexpected environmental pressures on personnel to the documented detriment of antimicrobial stewardship endeavors and patient outcomes. Clinician interest in shifting some operator burdens to assistive technology subsequently flared; in accordance with literature reports of successful blood culture contamination mitigation when initial-specimen diversion devices were co-opted into protocol, the National Quality Forum and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention backed a Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute revision to blood culture sample collection guidelines, recommending their use. This tech-centric tenet was hypothesized to be necessary to sustaining the successful mitigation of blood culture contamination through the stressor-heavy situations wherein education-focused endeavors alone were struggling to substantiate significance. Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention Outcome Data reflects approximately 36,000 blood cultures drawn each quarter. Methods Intervention began in 2020, prior to which a 3.6% blood culture contamination rate was observed systemwide. Seventeen facilities among nineteen that share a data system co-opted initial-specimen diversion device technology alongside value analysis and cultural curation in a trifurcate strategy to reduce contamination events. Results Consistent, real-time communication with caretakers on outcomes enabled year-over-year interventive technology utilization increases [currently approximately 85% systemwide]. The systemwide blood culture contamination rate for the first quarter of 2024 was 1.64% [586 contamination events among 35,750 total blood cultures], down from 1.9% across 2023, 2.8% across 2022, and 3.2% across 2021. Conclusion Tech-facilitated closure of contaminant pathways, when paired with communication channels connecting individual contributions to stewardship successes, sustained the year-over-year systemwide reduction in blood culture contamination events observed herein. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
United Hospital Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.