P-501. Concerns and Opinions of People Currently or Previously on Oral and Long-Acting Injectable Forms of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)

Abstract Background Long acting injectable (LAI) preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective tool that has the potential to increase PrEP uptake and adherence. However, the majority of studies investigating interest and opinions surrounding LAI PrEP were theoretical, done prior to its approval. It is important to better understand peoples’ opinions about LAI PrEP as uptake increases. Methods We administered a cross-sectional electronic survey to clients at an urban PrEP clinic in the US South. Eligible participants were 18+ years and had previously taken or been prescribed oral or LAI forms of PrEP. Participants were recruited at clinic appointments or through a link sent via the electronic medical record. Participants were asked about their preferences and concerns about oral and LAI PrEP and barriers to access PrEP. Results Between January 10-April 5, 2024, 110 participants completed the survey: 73 during in-person appointments and 37 via online links. Of those, 22 were currently using LAI PrEP, 71 oral PrEP, and 17 were not currently on a form of PrEP. Participants were mostly men (89.1%), and mean age was 38 (range 17-78). 54.5% of respondents were White, 30% Black, and 14.5% Latinx. Most participants preferred an injection versus a daily pill (100% of people already on LAI, 46.5% of people on oral PrEP, and 58.8% of people not currently on PrEP). The most common concerns about PrEP for all groups were side effects, cost of medication, and cost of clinic visits and tests. Of people taking oral PrEP, 59.2% had not switched to injectable either because it was not offered to them, or they were not aware of it. The most common reasons for stopping PrEP amongst people not currently using either form were side effects and no longer needing PrEP. Conclusion LAI PrEP is desired by many, but not all, people who are currently or have previously taken PrEP. Common concerns about PrEP include side effects and cost of medication and/or clinic visits. People on oral PrEP are frequently not offered LAI or do not know it exists. These data demonstrate the importance of improving LAI PrEP accessibility and offering people choice between PrEP methods. Disclosures Mehri McKellar, MD, Gilead: Grant/Research Support

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.700
Primary Topic
HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-501. Concerns and Opinions of People Currently or Previously on Oral and Long-Acting Injectable Forms of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)

Mehri S. McKellar, Frances Hung, Richard Barfield, Maxwell Allamong et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
article

P-501. Concerns and Opinions of People Currently or Previously on Oral and Long-Acting Injectable Forms of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)

Mehri S. McKellar, Frances Hung, Richard Barfield, Maxwell Allamong, Alice Schaack
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Long acting injectable (LAI) preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective tool that has the potential to increase PrEP uptake and adherence. However, the majority of studies investigating interest and opinions surrounding LAI PrEP were theoretical, done prior to its approval. It is important to better understand peoples’ opinions about LAI PrEP as uptake increases. Methods We administered a cross-sectional electronic survey to clients at an urban PrEP clinic in the US South. Eligible participants were 18+ years and had previously taken or been prescribed oral or LAI forms of PrEP. Participants were recruited at clinic appointments or through a link sent via the electronic medical record. Participants were asked about their preferences and concerns about oral and LAI PrEP and barriers to access PrEP. Results Between January 10-April 5, 2024, 110 participants completed the survey: 73 during in-person appointments and 37 via online links. Of those, 22 were currently using LAI PrEP, 71 oral PrEP, and 17 were not currently on a form of PrEP. Participants were mostly men (89.1%), and mean age was 38 (range 17-78). 54.5% of respondents were White, 30% Black, and 14.5% Latinx. Most participants preferred an injection versus a daily pill (100% of people already on LAI, 46.5% of people on oral PrEP, and 58.8% of people not currently on PrEP). The most common concerns about PrEP for all groups were side effects, cost of medication, and cost of clinic visits and tests. Of people taking oral PrEP, 59.2% had not switched to injectable either because it was not offered to them, or they were not aware of it. The most common reasons for stopping PrEP amongst people not currently using either form were side effects and no longer needing PrEP. Conclusion LAI PrEP is desired by many, but not all, people who are currently or have previously taken PrEP. Common concerns about PrEP include side effects and cost of medication and/or clinic visits. People on oral PrEP are frequently not offered LAI or do not know it exists. These data demonstrate the importance of improving LAI PrEP accessibility and offering people choice between PrEP methods. Disclosures Mehri McKellar, MD, Gilead: Grant/Research Support

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Duke University (US), Duke University Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.