P-2303. Active Surveillance and Antimicrobial Prophylaxis to Prevent Hyperammonemia Syndrome in Lung Transplant Recipients: A Single Center Cohort Study

Abstract Background Hyperammonemia syndrome (HS) is a life-threatening complication primarily affecting lung transplant recipients (LTR) and is associated with M. hominis and/or Ureaplasma spp infection. We implemented an active surveillance and prophylaxis protocol to improve outcomes associated with HS in LTR. Herein, we evaluate the impact of our protocol on outcomes of HS. Methods This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of adult LTR performed from 1/1/2019 to 1/31/2024. Our surveillance and prophylaxis protocol was implemented on 8/1/2022 and included PCR testing for M. hominis and Ureaplasma spp on post-operative bronchoscopy samples, measurement of serum ammonia levels, and azithromycin prophylaxis in our LTR. Comparisons between groups were performed using Chi-square or Fischer’s exact test for categorical variables and Student’s t test or Mann-Whitney U for continuous variables. Results One hundred and thirty-four adults received a lung transplant during the study period. Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. In total, 9 LTR (6.7%) were diagnosed with M. hominis or Ureaplasma spp. infection (Table 2). Of these, 3 LTR met criteria for definite HS (3/134, 2.2%) of whom two died. An additional 3 LTR had disseminated infection due to M. hominis without evidence of HS. Following protocol implementation, 31/37 (83.8%) LTR had PCR testing for M. hominis and Ureaplasma spp. (Table 2). Ammonia levels were sent within 3 days of transplantation in 20/37 (54.1%) LTR. All patients received prophylaxis with azithromycin (or alternative agent) for at least 5 days or until PCR returned negative. Three LTR had either M. hominis or Ureaplasma spp infection detected following protocol implementation; none developed HS. One LTR developed disseminated M. hominis infection. However, screening was delayed by 10 days and prophylaxis was stopped after 5 days, prior to screening results being known. Conclusion The prevalence of HS in our cohort is similar to published reports. Adherence to our protocol was high for azithromycin prophylaxis and PCR testing, but low for ammonia levels. Importantly, no case of definite HS occurred following protocol implementation. Additional studies to determine optimal screening and prophylaxis strategies for HS are needed. Disclosures Kapil K. Saharia, MD, MPH, Eurofins Viracor: Advisor/Consultant

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.2456
Primary Topic
Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-2303. Active Surveillance and Antimicrobial Prophylaxis to Prevent Hyperammonemia Syndrome in Lung Transplant Recipients: A Single Center Cohort Study

Kapil Saharia, Sara Lee, Ananth Charya, Michael Eberlein et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
article

P-2303. Active Surveillance and Antimicrobial Prophylaxis to Prevent Hyperammonemia Syndrome in Lung Transplant Recipients: A Single Center Cohort Study

Kapil Saharia, Sara Lee, Ananth Charya, Michael Eberlein, Drew Charles
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Hyperammonemia syndrome (HS) is a life-threatening complication primarily affecting lung transplant recipients (LTR) and is associated with M. hominis and/or Ureaplasma spp infection. We implemented an active surveillance and prophylaxis protocol to improve outcomes associated with HS in LTR. Herein, we evaluate the impact of our protocol on outcomes of HS. Methods This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of adult LTR performed from 1/1/2019 to 1/31/2024. Our surveillance and prophylaxis protocol was implemented on 8/1/2022 and included PCR testing for M. hominis and Ureaplasma spp on post-operative bronchoscopy samples, measurement of serum ammonia levels, and azithromycin prophylaxis in our LTR. Comparisons between groups were performed using Chi-square or Fischer’s exact test for categorical variables and Student’s t test or Mann-Whitney U for continuous variables. Results One hundred and thirty-four adults received a lung transplant during the study period. Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. In total, 9 LTR (6.7%) were diagnosed with M. hominis or Ureaplasma spp. infection (Table 2). Of these, 3 LTR met criteria for definite HS (3/134, 2.2%) of whom two died. An additional 3 LTR had disseminated infection due to M. hominis without evidence of HS. Following protocol implementation, 31/37 (83.8%) LTR had PCR testing for M. hominis and Ureaplasma spp. (Table 2). Ammonia levels were sent within 3 days of transplantation in 20/37 (54.1%) LTR. All patients received prophylaxis with azithromycin (or alternative agent) for at least 5 days or until PCR returned negative. Three LTR had either M. hominis or Ureaplasma spp infection detected following protocol implementation; none developed HS. One LTR developed disseminated M. hominis infection. However, screening was delayed by 10 days and prophylaxis was stopped after 5 days, prior to screening results being known. Conclusion The prevalence of HS in our cohort is similar to published reports. Adherence to our protocol was high for azithromycin prophylaxis and PCR testing, but low for ammonia levels. Importantly, no case of definite HS occurred following protocol implementation. Additional studies to determine optimal screening and prophylaxis strategies for HS are needed. Disclosures Kapil K. Saharia, MD, MPH, Eurofins Viracor: Advisor/Consultant

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), University of Maryland Medical Center (US), Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.