P-332. A Discrete Choice Experiment to Evaluate Healthcare Personnel Preferences Regarding Risk-Tailored Policies for Contact Precautions for Patients with Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> in Hospitals

Abstract Background The risk of MRSA transmission differs by healthcare personnel (HCP) role and care activity. An alternative to an “all or none” approach to contact precautions for patients with MRSA carriage is a “risk-tailored” approach – using gloves and gowns only for certain high-risk activities, locations, or roles. A discrete choice experiment is a proven method to assess HCP perspectives on varied implementation strategies. Methods We distributed a discrete choice experiment survey to HCPs at medical centers in three cities. Respondents were presented with eight choice sets, each consisting of two hypothetical policy options for glove and gown use to prevent MRSA transmission (Fig 1). In each comparison, respondents selected their preferred policy option. Using mixed logit modeling we calculated the utility derived from each policy component, the probability of uptake for the most favored policies, and heterogeneity in preferences based on HCP role. Results 384 HCP completed the survey: 138 from New York, 128 from Pittsburgh, and 118 from Baltimore. Respondents’ occupations were physicians or advanced practice providers (93, 24%), nurses (87, 23%), environmental services (56, 15%), respiratory therapists (55, 14%), occupational or physical therapists (44, 11%), and “other” (46, 11%). 237 (54%) respondents reported wearing gloves and gowns ‘all the time’ when required. Respondents preferred policy with the highest utility score was to use gloves and gown for all HCPs roles (utility, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.23), in high-risk settings (utility, 0.12; 95% CI 0.07-0.18), when touching the patient (utility, 0.11; 95% CI 0.06-0.17) (Fig 2). Sixty-three percent (95% CI 60-66%) of respondents would support a risk-tailored approach over an approach where contact precautions are used by all HCP in all settings and for all activities. The support for this policy varied by HCP role (p&amp;lt; 0.02), with the strongest probability of support from physicians and advanced practice providers (77%, 95% CI 72-82%) and the least support from environmental services (45%, 95% CI 37-53%) (Fig 3). Conclusion This discrete choice survey demonstrates that most HCP prefer a risk-tailored approach to contact precautions when caring for patients with MRSA. Disclosures Anthony Harris, MD, MPH, Innoviva: Advisor/Consultant|UpToDate: Infection Control Editor Graham M. Snyder, MD, SM, Infectious Diseases Connect: Advisor/Consultant Nathan N. O'Hara, PhD MHA, Arbutus Medical Inc.: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.535
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Food Safety and Hygiene
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-332. A Discrete Choice Experiment to Evaluate Healthcare Personnel Preferences Regarding Risk-Tailored Policies for Contact Precautions for Patients with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Hospitals

Graham M. Snyder, Nathan N. O’Hara, David P. Calfee, Elise Martin et al.
1 citations
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Food Safety and Hygiene
1.16
article

P-332. A Discrete Choice Experiment to Evaluate Healthcare Personnel Preferences Regarding Risk-Tailored Policies for Contact Precautions for Patients with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Hospitals

Graham M. Snyder, Nathan N. O’Hara, David P. Calfee, Elise Martin, Anthony D. Harris, Lyndsay M. O’Hara, Nicholas F Angelino
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background The risk of MRSA transmission differs by healthcare personnel (HCP) role and care activity. An alternative to an “all or none” approach to contact precautions for patients with MRSA carriage is a “risk-tailored” approach – using gloves and gowns only for certain high-risk activities, locations, or roles. A discrete choice experiment is a proven method to assess HCP perspectives on varied implementation strategies. Methods We distributed a discrete choice experiment survey to HCPs at medical centers in three cities. Respondents were presented with eight choice sets, each consisting of two hypothetical policy options for glove and gown use to prevent MRSA transmission (Fig 1). In each comparison, respondents selected their preferred policy option. Using mixed logit modeling we calculated the utility derived from each policy component, the probability of uptake for the most favored policies, and heterogeneity in preferences based on HCP role. Results 384 HCP completed the survey: 138 from New York, 128 from Pittsburgh, and 118 from Baltimore. Respondents’ occupations were physicians or advanced practice providers (93, 24%), nurses (87, 23%), environmental services (56, 15%), respiratory therapists (55, 14%), occupational or physical therapists (44, 11%), and “other” (46, 11%). 237 (54%) respondents reported wearing gloves and gowns ‘all the time’ when required. Respondents preferred policy with the highest utility score was to use gloves and gown for all HCPs roles (utility, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.23), in high-risk settings (utility, 0.12; 95% CI 0.07-0.18), when touching the patient (utility, 0.11; 95% CI 0.06-0.17) (Fig 2). Sixty-three percent (95% CI 60-66%) of respondents would support a risk-tailored approach over an approach where contact precautions are used by all HCP in all settings and for all activities. The support for this policy varied by HCP role (p&amp;lt; 0.02), with the strongest probability of support from physicians and advanced practice providers (77%, 95% CI 72-82%) and the least support from environmental services (45%, 95% CI 37-53%) (Fig 3). Conclusion This discrete choice survey demonstrates that most HCP prefer a risk-tailored approach to contact precautions when caring for patients with MRSA. Disclosures Anthony Harris, MD, MPH, Innoviva: Advisor/Consultant|UpToDate: Infection Control Editor Graham M. Snyder, MD, SM, Infectious Diseases Connect: Advisor/Consultant Nathan N. O'Hara, PhD MHA, Arbutus Medical Inc.: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company)

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), Cornell University (US), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Food Safety and Hygiene
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.