P-1882. Answering the Call: Volume and Characteristics of External Phone Consultations to Pediatric Infectious Diseases Specialists at a Large Academic Children's Hospital

Abstract Background Due to the limited supply and geographic distribution of pediatric infectious diseases (Peds ID) specialists, providing unremunerated telephone advice to outside clinicians has become a significant component of day-to-day practice for many academic Peds ID clinicians. This time-consuming service is not classified as direct patient care or adequately captured by traditional billing and productivity metrics. The objective of this study was to quantify and characterize external phone consults to Peds ID specialists at Children’s Hospital Colorado (CHCO), and compare the burden of these phone consults to other pediatric subspecialists. Methods External phone consults to pediatric subspecialists at CHCO from April 2019-March 2024 were obtained from the electronic medical record (EMR). Patient and call characteristics for Peds ID were summarized with descriptive statistics. Results From 2021-2023, Peds ID received the second most external phone consults (n=6376) of any pediatric subspecialty. From 2019 to 2024, average calls to Peds ID increased 21% from 38 to 46 calls/week. One-quarter of calls were about patients registered in the EMR only for the phone encounter and never for direct patient care. Most calls concerned children < 5 years and 9% were for children 0-7 days old. Eighty-five percent of calls occurred between 8AM-5PM and 23% requested immediate callback. Fridays had the most calls (mean 7.6 calls/day), and Sundays had the least (2.1). Based on dummy time-based RVU codes, the median call time was 11-20 minutes; 36% of calls required at least one follow-up call. Only 11% of calls were expected to lead to direct patient care at CHCO based on clinician recommendation. Peds ID specialists spent over 2000 unbilled hours on external phone consults over the study period and an average of > 10 hours/week in the most recent year of data. Conclusion External phone consults to Peds ID at CHCO are increasing and time-consuming, yet do not directly generate revenue and do not reliably lead to direct patient care in our health system. Given limited supply, increased demand, and reimbursement challenges for Peds ID clinicians, different economic models for external phone consults should be explored. Chart review to describe callers, reasons for calls, and patient outcomes may inform these efforts. Disclosures Juri Boguniewicz, MD, AstraZeneca: Grant/Research Support

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.2043
Primary Topic
Respiratory viral infections research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1882. Answering the Call: Volume and Characteristics of External Phone Consultations to Pediatric Infectious Diseases Specialists at a Large Academic Children's Hospital

Jessica R. Cataldi, Erin C Ho, Kevin Messacar, Juri Boguniewicz et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Respiratory viral infections research
article

P-1882. Answering the Call: Volume and Characteristics of External Phone Consultations to Pediatric Infectious Diseases Specialists at a Large Academic Children's Hospital

Jessica R. Cataldi, Erin C Ho, Kevin Messacar, Juri Boguniewicz, Justin B. Searns, Joana Dimo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Due to the limited supply and geographic distribution of pediatric infectious diseases (Peds ID) specialists, providing unremunerated telephone advice to outside clinicians has become a significant component of day-to-day practice for many academic Peds ID clinicians. This time-consuming service is not classified as direct patient care or adequately captured by traditional billing and productivity metrics. The objective of this study was to quantify and characterize external phone consults to Peds ID specialists at Children’s Hospital Colorado (CHCO), and compare the burden of these phone consults to other pediatric subspecialists. Methods External phone consults to pediatric subspecialists at CHCO from April 2019-March 2024 were obtained from the electronic medical record (EMR). Patient and call characteristics for Peds ID were summarized with descriptive statistics. Results From 2021-2023, Peds ID received the second most external phone consults (n=6376) of any pediatric subspecialty. From 2019 to 2024, average calls to Peds ID increased 21% from 38 to 46 calls/week. One-quarter of calls were about patients registered in the EMR only for the phone encounter and never for direct patient care. Most calls concerned children < 5 years and 9% were for children 0-7 days old. Eighty-five percent of calls occurred between 8AM-5PM and 23% requested immediate callback. Fridays had the most calls (mean 7.6 calls/day), and Sundays had the least (2.1). Based on dummy time-based RVU codes, the median call time was 11-20 minutes; 36% of calls required at least one follow-up call. Only 11% of calls were expected to lead to direct patient care at CHCO based on clinician recommendation. Peds ID specialists spent over 2000 unbilled hours on external phone consults over the study period and an average of > 10 hours/week in the most recent year of data. Conclusion External phone consults to Peds ID at CHCO are increasing and time-consuming, yet do not directly generate revenue and do not reliably lead to direct patient care in our health system. Given limited supply, increased demand, and reimbursement challenges for Peds ID clinicians, different economic models for external phone consults should be explored. Chart review to describe callers, reasons for calls, and patient outcomes may inform these efforts. Disclosures Juri Boguniewicz, MD, AstraZeneca: Grant/Research Support

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Children's Hospital Colorado (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Respiratory viral infections research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.