P-1387. Barriers to PrEP Implementation in Publicly Funded Family Planning Clinics in Atlanta, Georgia

Abstract Background Although Georgia has the highest HIV incidence in the US, uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV is inadequate, especially among cisgender (cis) women. The Title X Family Planning Program (FP) provides federal funding for sexual health services to low income or uninsured individuals. We sought to understand clinic interest in and capacity for women-centered PrEP care implementation in Title X FP clinics in metro Atlanta. Methods From Jan 2022-Nov 2023, we held focus groups with 47 participants representing 22 FP clinics across four metro Atlanta Ending the HIV Epidemic priority counties (71% of all Title X FP clinics in the area). We used a structured interview guide to assess PrEP implementation strategies across each step of PrEP care; participants included advanced practice providers, medical assistants, nurses, and FP program leaders. Following standard rapid qualitative analytic methods, two trained researchers created a matrix of responses by question, assessed salience of responses by deductive themes, and used memos to summarize themes for narrative description. Results Clinics had few-to-no cis women on PrEP. Conversations regarding PrEP eligibility were often patient-initiated, rather than provider-initiated. Many providers expressed unfamiliarity with sexual history taking and assessing HIV risk, especially with cis women. Providers also cited patient barriers to PrEP uptake and persistence, including insurance navigation and follow-up visit costs. All providers expressed a need for time-efficient screening and counseling procedures and trainings covering sexual history taking, destigmatizing PrEP, and medication access. Population-tailored information, such as non-English, youth-focused, and low literacy responsive materials were highly desired (Table 1). Conclusion Family planning clinics in Atlanta require comprehensive training across the steps of PrEP care, given limited provider initiation of and comfort with risk assessment and counseling, and perceived barriers to uptake and retention. Multi-pronged implementation strategies are necessary to prevent new HIV infections, particularly among cis women, and to progress toward ending the HIV epidemic. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1563
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1387. Barriers to PrEP Implementation in Publicly Funded Family Planning Clinics in Atlanta, Georgia

Lily Bonadonna, Katherine M. Anderson, Deja L Er, Anandi N. Sheth et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
article

P-1387. Barriers to PrEP Implementation in Publicly Funded Family Planning Clinics in Atlanta, Georgia

Lily Bonadonna, Katherine M. Anderson, Deja L Er, Anandi N. Sheth, Jessica M. Sales
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Although Georgia has the highest HIV incidence in the US, uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV is inadequate, especially among cisgender (cis) women. The Title X Family Planning Program (FP) provides federal funding for sexual health services to low income or uninsured individuals. We sought to understand clinic interest in and capacity for women-centered PrEP care implementation in Title X FP clinics in metro Atlanta. Methods From Jan 2022-Nov 2023, we held focus groups with 47 participants representing 22 FP clinics across four metro Atlanta Ending the HIV Epidemic priority counties (71% of all Title X FP clinics in the area). We used a structured interview guide to assess PrEP implementation strategies across each step of PrEP care; participants included advanced practice providers, medical assistants, nurses, and FP program leaders. Following standard rapid qualitative analytic methods, two trained researchers created a matrix of responses by question, assessed salience of responses by deductive themes, and used memos to summarize themes for narrative description. Results Clinics had few-to-no cis women on PrEP. Conversations regarding PrEP eligibility were often patient-initiated, rather than provider-initiated. Many providers expressed unfamiliarity with sexual history taking and assessing HIV risk, especially with cis women. Providers also cited patient barriers to PrEP uptake and persistence, including insurance navigation and follow-up visit costs. All providers expressed a need for time-efficient screening and counseling procedures and trainings covering sexual history taking, destigmatizing PrEP, and medication access. Population-tailored information, such as non-English, youth-focused, and low literacy responsive materials were highly desired (Table 1). Conclusion Family planning clinics in Atlanta require comprehensive training across the steps of PrEP care, given limited provider initiation of and comfort with risk assessment and counseling, and perceived barriers to uptake and retention. Multi-pronged implementation strategies are necessary to prevent new HIV infections, particularly among cis women, and to progress toward ending the HIV epidemic. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Emory University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.