P-1984. AB2CO: a mortality risk score for COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units

Abstract Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, several scoring systems have been developed and tested to stratify patients according to their risk levels, enabling the proper allocation of resources and increasing the likelihood of successful outcomes. However, there remains a gap in the availability of an effective tool for predicting in-hospital mortality among COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Most of the studies are bounded my methodological flaws which may lead to different bias, and uses data before the emergence of new variants and the broad use of vaccionation, that my impact scores' performance. We aimed to address this gap by developing a novel risk score and comparing it with other existing scores using more recent data. Area under the ROC curve of the AB2CO risk score Methods This multicenter observational study included adult (≥18 years) patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 who were admitted to 18 ICUs from 9 Brazilian cities, from September/2021 to July/2022. A total of 558 patients were included in the analysis, median age was 69 years (interquartile range 58-78), 56.3% were men, 19.7% required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and 44.8% died during hospitalization. Potential predictors were selected based on a thorough literature review. Generalized Additive Models were used to assess outcomes and predictors, while LASSO regression was employed to develop the mortality score. Risk groups stratification were divided based on the predicted death probability as intermediate, high, and very high risk. Calibration plot of the AB2CO risk score Results The final model, named AB2CO, comprised 6 variables: age, pO2/FiO2, respiratory function (respiratory rate or indication of IMV), COPD, and obesity. The AB2CO model showed an area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve of 0.781 (95% CI 0.744 to 0.819), good overall performance and an excellent calibration. Furthermore, on a complete case analysis the score achieved a discrimination ability of 0.783 (CI 95% 0.743-0.822), and it was compared with other existing scores and exhibited better performance than all of them. Conclusion The AB2CO score is a simple and easy tool, based on only six varibles routinely available in ICU. It may provide guidance for clinical decisions. Discrimination ability for each risk score applied in the Brazilian database of COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit, and comparison of the derived and other existing scores. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.2142
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1984. AB2CO: a mortality risk score for COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units

Magda Carvalho Pires, Vandack Nobre, Virgínia Mara Reis Gomes, Polianna Delfino-Pereira et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
article

P-1984. AB2CO: a mortality risk score for COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units

Magda Carvalho Pires, Vandack Nobre, Virgínia Mara Reis Gomes, Polianna Delfino-Pereira, Milena Soriano Marcolino
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, several scoring systems have been developed and tested to stratify patients according to their risk levels, enabling the proper allocation of resources and increasing the likelihood of successful outcomes. However, there remains a gap in the availability of an effective tool for predicting in-hospital mortality among COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Most of the studies are bounded my methodological flaws which may lead to different bias, and uses data before the emergence of new variants and the broad use of vaccionation, that my impact scores' performance. We aimed to address this gap by developing a novel risk score and comparing it with other existing scores using more recent data. Area under the ROC curve of the AB2CO risk score Methods This multicenter observational study included adult (≥18 years) patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 who were admitted to 18 ICUs from 9 Brazilian cities, from September/2021 to July/2022. A total of 558 patients were included in the analysis, median age was 69 years (interquartile range 58-78), 56.3% were men, 19.7% required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and 44.8% died during hospitalization. Potential predictors were selected based on a thorough literature review. Generalized Additive Models were used to assess outcomes and predictors, while LASSO regression was employed to develop the mortality score. Risk groups stratification were divided based on the predicted death probability as intermediate, high, and very high risk. Calibration plot of the AB2CO risk score Results The final model, named AB2CO, comprised 6 variables: age, pO2/FiO2, respiratory function (respiratory rate or indication of IMV), COPD, and obesity. The AB2CO model showed an area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve of 0.781 (95% CI 0.744 to 0.819), good overall performance and an excellent calibration. Furthermore, on a complete case analysis the score achieved a discrimination ability of 0.783 (CI 95% 0.743-0.822), and it was compared with other existing scores and exhibited better performance than all of them. Conclusion The AB2CO score is a simple and easy tool, based on only six varibles routinely available in ICU. It may provide guidance for clinical decisions. Discrimination ability for each risk score applied in the Brazilian database of COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit, and comparison of the derived and other existing scores. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.