P-331. Patient Perspectives Regarding the Use of Contact Precautions for Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> in a VA Acute Care Hospital

Abstract Background The optimal approach to using contact precautions for patients known to be colonized or infected with MRSA remains unclear despite knowledge that transmission risk varies by healthcare personnel role and care activity being performed. Additionally, the patient perspective is not routinely represented in infection control policies. The aim of this study was to assess patient perspectives on risk-based application of MRSA contact precautions in VA hospitals. Methods We conducted an in-person 75-minute focus group with seven Veteran patients colonized with MRSA. The session was audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. We developed a codebook based on the interview guide and used Nvivo 9 for analysis. One research team member coded the transcripts. Thematic analysis was utilized to summarize the findings. Emergent themes and patterns were identified by initial inductive analysis and themes were condensed into overarching categories. Results All patients agreed that they would prefer if healthcare workers wore gloves and a gown the entire time when providing care to all patients with MRSA. As shown in Table 1, participants identified three themes related to perceived advantages to the use of contact precautions for all care of patients with MRSA. The most frequently mentioned advantage was that doing so aligns with the premise that protecting patients and making them feel safe while in hospital should be the top priority. Participants also acknowledged five themes describing disadvantages to contact precautions such as the environmental impact and cost but stressed that these disadvantages should not be used to rationalize provision of what they viewed as suboptimal care. Most participants were open to a risk-tailored approach instead of total removal of all contact although some articulated concerns this may make patients may feel less safe and feel like they are not being treated equally. Conclusion These qualitative findings suggest that Veteran patients with MRSA support the use of contact precautions and are willing to consider a risk-tailored approach to glove and gown use if this is accompanied by education for healthcare personnel, patients, and families. Disclosures Anthony Harris, MD, MPH, Innoviva: Advisor/Consultant|UpToDate: Infection Control Editor

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.534
Primary Topic
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-331. Patient Perspectives Regarding the Use of Contact Precautions for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a VA Acute Care Hospital

Lisa Pineles, Kathleen A. Linder, Michelle Newman, Karim Khader et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
article

P-331. Patient Perspectives Regarding the Use of Contact Precautions for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a VA Acute Care Hospital

Lisa Pineles, Kathleen A. Linder, Michelle Newman, Karim Khader, Richard E. Nelson, Michael Rubin, Gio Baracco, Matthew Bidwell Goetz, Mary Bahr-Robertson, Eli N. Perencevich, Anthony Harris, Martin E. Evans, Lyndsay M. O’Hara
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The optimal approach to using contact precautions for patients known to be colonized or infected with MRSA remains unclear despite knowledge that transmission risk varies by healthcare personnel role and care activity being performed. Additionally, the patient perspective is not routinely represented in infection control policies. The aim of this study was to assess patient perspectives on risk-based application of MRSA contact precautions in VA hospitals. Methods We conducted an in-person 75-minute focus group with seven Veteran patients colonized with MRSA. The session was audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. We developed a codebook based on the interview guide and used Nvivo 9 for analysis. One research team member coded the transcripts. Thematic analysis was utilized to summarize the findings. Emergent themes and patterns were identified by initial inductive analysis and themes were condensed into overarching categories. Results All patients agreed that they would prefer if healthcare workers wore gloves and a gown the entire time when providing care to all patients with MRSA. As shown in Table 1, participants identified three themes related to perceived advantages to the use of contact precautions for all care of patients with MRSA. The most frequently mentioned advantage was that doing so aligns with the premise that protecting patients and making them feel safe while in hospital should be the top priority. Participants also acknowledged five themes describing disadvantages to contact precautions such as the environmental impact and cost but stressed that these disadvantages should not be used to rationalize provision of what they viewed as suboptimal care. Most participants were open to a risk-tailored approach instead of total removal of all contact although some articulated concerns this may make patients may feel less safe and feel like they are not being treated equally. Conclusion These qualitative findings suggest that Veteran patients with MRSA support the use of contact precautions and are willing to consider a risk-tailored approach to glove and gown use if this is accompanied by education for healthcare personnel, patients, and families. Disclosures Anthony Harris, MD, MPH, Innoviva: Advisor/Consultant|UpToDate: Infection Control Editor

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
University of Iowa (US), University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), University of Utah (US), University of Michigan (US), Ann Arbor VA Medical Center (US), Iowa City VA Medical Center (US), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (US), Miami VA Healthcare System (US), University of Baltimore (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.