P-276. Outcomes Following Cefiderocol vs. Meropenem Treatment for Gram-Negative Pneumonia: A Real-World Data Analysis

Abstract Background The prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative pneumonia continues to increase across the United States (U.S.). Recently, cefiderocol (Fetroja), was approved to treat MDR-negative pneumonia, overcoming several beta-lactam resistance mechanisms. While cefiderocol has been utilized over the last 6 years, additional studies are needed to assess its use long-term. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of gram-negative pneumonia patients treated with either cefiderocol or meropenem utilizing real-world data. Methods This was a retrospective cross-sectional study between 05/02/2018 and 05/02/2024 utilizing the TriNetX Research Network, consisting of 88 U.S. and ex-U.S. healthcare organizations. Patients were included if they had an ICD-10 code for gram-negative pneumonia and receipt of cefiderocol or meropenem after pneumonia diagnosis, defined by RxNorm codes. Antibiotic receipt after pneumonia diagnosis defined the index event date. Patient cohorts were balanced using demographic (age, sex, race) and clinical data (antibiotic use, and XX co-morbidities) via a 1:1 greedy, nearest neighbor propensity score matching (PSM) with a 0.1 caliper. Outcomes following this index event included mortality, Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), epilepsy/recurrent seizures, coagulation defects, pulmonary fibrosis (PF), and sepsis. A Kaplan-Meier Analysis was used to compare the proportion of ceficerocol or meropenem patients with each outcome of interest one-year post-index. Results After PSM, cefiderocol (n=94) showed no significant differences in mortality (HR 1.38, 95% 0.87-2.18), CDI (HR 1.04, 95% 0.26-4.17), epilepsy/recurrent seizures (HR 1.64, 95% 0.67-4.01), PF (HR 1.20, 95% 0.40-3.60), or sepsis (HR 1.17, 95% 0.75-1.81) one year post-index vs. meropenem (n=94). Cefiderocol patients had lower rates of coagulation defects (HR 0.2, 95% 0.04-0.91, p=0.021). Conclusion Overall, cefiderocol patients showed no differences in mortality, CDI, epilepsy/recurrent seizures, PF, or sepsis. However, patients treated with cefiderocol for gram-negative pneumonia had a lower rate of coagulopathies. Additional real-world studies are needed to monitor its long-term outcomes. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.480
Primary Topic
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-276. Outcomes Following Cefiderocol vs. Meropenem Treatment for Gram-Negative Pneumonia: A Real-World Data Analysis

Benjamin Haslund-Gourley
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
article

P-276. Outcomes Following Cefiderocol vs. Meropenem Treatment for Gram-Negative Pneumonia: A Real-World Data Analysis

Benjamin Haslund-Gourley
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative pneumonia continues to increase across the United States (U.S.). Recently, cefiderocol (Fetroja), was approved to treat MDR-negative pneumonia, overcoming several beta-lactam resistance mechanisms. While cefiderocol has been utilized over the last 6 years, additional studies are needed to assess its use long-term. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of gram-negative pneumonia patients treated with either cefiderocol or meropenem utilizing real-world data. Methods This was a retrospective cross-sectional study between 05/02/2018 and 05/02/2024 utilizing the TriNetX Research Network, consisting of 88 U.S. and ex-U.S. healthcare organizations. Patients were included if they had an ICD-10 code for gram-negative pneumonia and receipt of cefiderocol or meropenem after pneumonia diagnosis, defined by RxNorm codes. Antibiotic receipt after pneumonia diagnosis defined the index event date. Patient cohorts were balanced using demographic (age, sex, race) and clinical data (antibiotic use, and XX co-morbidities) via a 1:1 greedy, nearest neighbor propensity score matching (PSM) with a 0.1 caliper. Outcomes following this index event included mortality, Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), epilepsy/recurrent seizures, coagulation defects, pulmonary fibrosis (PF), and sepsis. A Kaplan-Meier Analysis was used to compare the proportion of ceficerocol or meropenem patients with each outcome of interest one-year post-index. Results After PSM, cefiderocol (n=94) showed no significant differences in mortality (HR 1.38, 95% 0.87-2.18), CDI (HR 1.04, 95% 0.26-4.17), epilepsy/recurrent seizures (HR 1.64, 95% 0.67-4.01), PF (HR 1.20, 95% 0.40-3.60), or sepsis (HR 1.17, 95% 0.75-1.81) one year post-index vs. meropenem (n=94). Cefiderocol patients had lower rates of coagulation defects (HR 0.2, 95% 0.04-0.91, p=0.021). Conclusion Overall, cefiderocol patients showed no differences in mortality, CDI, epilepsy/recurrent seizures, PF, or sepsis. However, patients treated with cefiderocol for gram-negative pneumonia had a lower rate of coagulopathies. Additional real-world studies are needed to monitor its long-term outcomes. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Drexel University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.