P-1444. Impacts of LGBT Equality Index and 2016 UN Resolution Vote on AIDS-Related Mortality

Abstract Background Stigma surrounding HIV has been well-described as a barrier to HIV care engagement. Much of this arises from a belief that only certain groups of people can get HIV as well as public opinion and government policies toward LGBT people. Recognizing the effects of discriminatory laws against individuals based on sexual orientation and gender identity, the United Nations Human Rights Council adopted resolution A/HRC/RES/32/2 in 2016, deploring acts of violence and discrimination based on these traits. Our study had two aims: first, to assess if a country’s AIDS-related mortality differed based on how the country voted on the 2016 resolution and, second, to describe whether greater legal protection of LGBT rights was associated with reduced AIDS-related mortality. Methods We used HIV prevalence and mortality estimates in men aged 15-49 from the Global Burden of Disease 2019 to determine the case fatality rate for men aged 15-49 living with HIV by country. To estimate the legal protection of LGBT rights, we utilized the Equaldex Equality Index, a publicly available rating from 0 to 100 describing LGBT legal protections and public opinion by country, with higher values reflecting greater equality. We then performed multivariate log-linear regression to describe the relationship between a country’s AIDS-related mortality among men 15-49 and that country’s Equality Index and vote on the 2016 resolution, adjusted for WHO region. Results AIDS-related fatality rate was available for 204 countries/territories, an Equality Index was available for 196 countries, and 47 countries voted. In the countries that voted in favor, there was a 65% (95% CI 43-79%, p< .001) relative risk reduction in AIDS-related fatality rate. When adjusted for WHO region, the relative risk reduction was 72% (95% CI 35-88%, p< .06). Assessing the impact of the Equality Index, multivariate log-linear analysis adjusting for region showed that for every 1 point increase there was a 1.6% (CI 1.2-2.0%, p< 0.001) relative risk reduction in AIDS-related fatality rate. Conclusion The results of this study support the hypothesis that increasing LGBT legal protection can improve HIV care engagement. It also highlights the significant impact public opinion and government policies toward LGBT people has on AIDS-related mortality. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1616
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1444. Impacts of LGBT Equality Index and 2016 UN Resolution Vote on AIDS-Related Mortality

Kevin S Ikuta, Neil Modi
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
article

P-1444. Impacts of LGBT Equality Index and 2016 UN Resolution Vote on AIDS-Related Mortality

Kevin S Ikuta, Neil Modi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Stigma surrounding HIV has been well-described as a barrier to HIV care engagement. Much of this arises from a belief that only certain groups of people can get HIV as well as public opinion and government policies toward LGBT people. Recognizing the effects of discriminatory laws against individuals based on sexual orientation and gender identity, the United Nations Human Rights Council adopted resolution A/HRC/RES/32/2 in 2016, deploring acts of violence and discrimination based on these traits. Our study had two aims: first, to assess if a country’s AIDS-related mortality differed based on how the country voted on the 2016 resolution and, second, to describe whether greater legal protection of LGBT rights was associated with reduced AIDS-related mortality. Methods We used HIV prevalence and mortality estimates in men aged 15-49 from the Global Burden of Disease 2019 to determine the case fatality rate for men aged 15-49 living with HIV by country. To estimate the legal protection of LGBT rights, we utilized the Equaldex Equality Index, a publicly available rating from 0 to 100 describing LGBT legal protections and public opinion by country, with higher values reflecting greater equality. We then performed multivariate log-linear regression to describe the relationship between a country’s AIDS-related mortality among men 15-49 and that country’s Equality Index and vote on the 2016 resolution, adjusted for WHO region. Results AIDS-related fatality rate was available for 204 countries/territories, an Equality Index was available for 196 countries, and 47 countries voted. In the countries that voted in favor, there was a 65% (95% CI 43-79%, p< .001) relative risk reduction in AIDS-related fatality rate. When adjusted for WHO region, the relative risk reduction was 72% (95% CI 35-88%, p< .06). Assessing the impact of the Equality Index, multivariate log-linear analysis adjusting for region showed that for every 1 point increase there was a 1.6% (CI 1.2-2.0%, p< 0.001) relative risk reduction in AIDS-related fatality rate. Conclusion The results of this study support the hypothesis that increasing LGBT legal protection can improve HIV care engagement. It also highlights the significant impact public opinion and government policies toward LGBT people has on AIDS-related mortality. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
UCLA Health (US), VA West Los Angeles Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.