The influence of cardiopulmonary bypass residual volume processing technique on blood management in cardiac surgical patients

<i>Background:</i> Post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) blood processing is an important component of blood management during cardiac surgery. <i>Purpose:</i> The purpose of this study is to evaluate several methods of processing post-CPB residual blood.<i>Research Design:</i> Using a multi-institutional national database (SpecialtyCare Operative Procedural rEgistry [SCOPE]), 77,591 cardiac surgical operations performed in adults (>18 years) between January 2017 and September 2022 were reviewed.<i>Study Sample:</i> Blood processing methods included: Cell washing (CW, <i>n</i> = 63,592), Ultrafiltration (UF, <i>n</i> = 6286), Whole blood (WB, <i>n</i> = 3749), Hemobag (HB, <i>n</i> = 2480), and No processing (NO, <i>n</i> = 1484). The primary outcome was intraoperative post-CPB allogenic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion.<i>Data Analysis:</i> Group differences in RBC transfusion were assessed using a Bayesian mixed-effects logistic regression model controlling for multiple operative variables.<i>Results:</i> Across blood processing groups, patients had similar ages, body mass index and surgical procedures performed as well as preoperative hematocrit and nadir operative hematocrit. Median hematocrit change from last-in-operating room to first-in-ICU were highest in UF and HB groups (3.0 [IQR = 2.0-4.8] and 2.5 [IQR = 0.4-5.0]), respectively. The model-predicted probability of intraoperative post-CPB RBC transfusion was lowest in the HB group (0.79% [95% CrI = 0.37%-1.26%]), and highest in NO group (2.12% [95% CrI = 1.47%-2.82%]). Relative to CW, the odds of RBC transfusion for HB cases were reduced by half (OR = 0.5 [95% CrI = 0.28-0.89], statistical reliability = 99.1%), while odds for NO were 1.41 greater (OR = 1.41 [95% CrI = 1.03-1.93], statistical reliability = 98.2%).<i>Conclusions:</i> Post-CPB blood processing affects the likelihood for both receiving an intraoperative post-CPB RBC transfusion and for hematocrit change, with HB use resulting in the lowest predicted risk for transfusion, and NO the highest.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perfusion
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591251317678
Primary Topic
Blood transfusion and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The influence of cardiopulmonary bypass residual volume processing technique on blood management in cardiac surgical patients

Jeffrey Chores, Craig M. Petterson, Eric A. Tesdahl, Alfred H. Stammers et al.
Perfusion
Blood transfusion and management
article

The influence of cardiopulmonary bypass residual volume processing technique on blood management in cardiac surgical patients

Jeffrey Chores, Craig M. Petterson, Eric A. Tesdahl, Alfred H. Stammers, Omar M. Sharaf, Jeffrey Phillip Jacobs, Michael S. Firstenberg, Charles Wilkins, Stephen Choi, Jennifer Baeza, Scott P. Beckman, Alexander Baginski, Kirti Patel, Ty Thompson
article en

Abstract

<i>Background:</i> Post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) blood processing is an important component of blood management during cardiac surgery. <i>Purpose:</i> The purpose of this study is to evaluate several methods of processing post-CPB residual blood.<i>Research Design:</i> Using a multi-institutional national database (SpecialtyCare Operative Procedural rEgistry [SCOPE]), 77,591 cardiac surgical operations performed in adults (>18 years) between January 2017 and September 2022 were reviewed.<i>Study Sample:</i> Blood processing methods included: Cell washing (CW, <i>n</i> = 63,592), Ultrafiltration (UF, <i>n</i> = 6286), Whole blood (WB, <i>n</i> = 3749), Hemobag (HB, <i>n</i> = 2480), and No processing (NO, <i>n</i> = 1484). The primary outcome was intraoperative post-CPB allogenic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion.<i>Data Analysis:</i> Group differences in RBC transfusion were assessed using a Bayesian mixed-effects logistic regression model controlling for multiple operative variables.<i>Results:</i> Across blood processing groups, patients had similar ages, body mass index and surgical procedures performed as well as preoperative hematocrit and nadir operative hematocrit. Median hematocrit change from last-in-operating room to first-in-ICU were highest in UF and HB groups (3.0 [IQR = 2.0-4.8] and 2.5 [IQR = 0.4-5.0]), respectively. The model-predicted probability of intraoperative post-CPB RBC transfusion was lowest in the HB group (0.79% [95% CrI = 0.37%-1.26%]), and highest in NO group (2.12% [95% CrI = 1.47%-2.82%]). Relative to CW, the odds of RBC transfusion for HB cases were reduced by half (OR = 0.5 [95% CrI = 0.28-0.89], statistical reliability = 99.1%), while odds for NO were 1.41 greater (OR = 1.41 [95% CrI = 1.03-1.93], statistical reliability = 98.2%).<i>Conclusions:</i> Post-CPB blood processing affects the likelihood for both receiving an intraoperative post-CPB RBC transfusion and for hematocrit change, with HB use resulting in the lowest predicted risk for transfusion, and NO the highest.

PerfusionVol. 40(7)
Lipscomb University (US), Memorial Medical Center (US), University of Florida (US), Kansas City CARE Clinic (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Blood transfusion and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.