P-1694. Estimating the Use of Newer Beta-lactam Gram-negative Targeted Antibiotics Across Greater than 700 Hospitals in the United States
Abstract Background Newer broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics (cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam) have been introduced. Ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam predominated newer antibiotic use through 2021; however, less is known about current use patterns and for what clinical indications, in inpatient settings. The aim of this study was to describe the use of these newer antibiotics across a large national cohort. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults discharged from June 2022 through May 2023 among hospitals in the Premier Healthcare Database. Antibiotic utilization was ascertained from daily charge data, and clinical indication(s) were inferred from ICD-10 diagnosis codes. A stratified analysis was performed among patients receiving >3 days of antibiotic therapy to understand when these antibiotics are being used as definitive therapy. Results Across 832 hospitals, 3,890,557 admissions (61.9% of all admissions) included receipt of antibiotics. In 8,655 admissions (0.2% of antibiotic-prescribing admissions), newer antibiotics were prescribed (see Table 1 for patient demographic distribution). Ceftolozane-tazobactam was prescribed in 4157 (48%), 3660 (42.3%) ceftazidime-avibactam, 1060 (12.2%) cefiderocol, 456 (5.3%) meropenem-vaborbactam, and 99 (1.1%) imipenem-relebactam. Most patients who received newer antibiotics (69%, n=5,998) received them for greater than 3 days. Of these, ceftolozane-tazobactam was prescribed in 2607 admissions (43.5%), 2505 (41.7%) ceftazidime-avibactam, 832 (13.9%) cefiderocol, 332 (5.5%)meropenem-vaborbactam, and 68 (1.1%) imipenem-relebactam for greater than 3 days. Sepsis was the most common clinical indication for receipt of newer agents, followed by urinary tract infection (Table 2). Conclusion Ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam remain the most frequently prescribed new antibiotics, with uptake of subsequently approved agents trailing. Most of the prescribing of these antibiotics are for sepsis. Disclosures Anthony Harris, MD, MPH, Innoviva: Advisor/Consultant|UpToDate: Infection Control Editor Kimberly C. Claeys, PharmD, PhD, bioMérieux: Advisor/Consultant|bioMérieux: Honoraria
Authors
- Lisa Pineles (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2377-5971)
- Jonathan Baghdadi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2442-0654)
- Jacqueline Bork (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1546-6634)
- Justin Brooks (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6324-9167)
- Emily L. Heil (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6644-6684)
- Katherine E Goodman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2851-775X)
- Bradley A. Maron (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6784-764X)
- Sameer S. Kadri (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4420-9004)
- Kimberly C. Claeys (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6895-604X)
- Morgan Walker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4699-6777)
- Anthony Harris (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4418-9944)
Institutions
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (US)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US)
- National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (US)
- University of Baltimore (US)
- University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Open Forum Infectious Diseases
- Published
- 2025-01-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1860
- Primary Topic
- Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00