P-1816. Stepwise Implementation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Prospective Audit and Feedback Intervention at a Large Academic Center in Canada
Abstract Background Effective implementation strategies for establishing antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program inpatient interventions are not well described. We describe a methodology for prospective audit and feedback (PAF) implementation at a large Canadian hospital and report its outcomes. Methods A PAF intervention targeting restricted antibiotics (carbapenems, daptomycin, linezolid, and tigecycline) was launched in March 2018. Stepwise implementation by inpatient programs was prioritized by collaboration readiness as immediate site-wide implementation was deemed unfeasible. New prescriptions were assessed by the antimicrobial stewardship team. Prescription, prescriber, intervention type, and acceptance data were collected through March 2024. Results Over a 2-year period, site wide stepwise implementation occurred in 16 discrete phases. Over the study period, 5185 prescriptions were evaluated; 3789 (73%) were empiric, and 1396 (27%) culture directed from which 3604 (70%) were optimally prescribed (evaluated by agent, regimen, and duration). Of empiric prescriptions, 636 (17%) were not guideline-concordant by indication, 1102 (29%) did not follow guidelines but was reasonable by expert opinion, and 2051 (54%) were guideline-concordant. ASP recommendations included: 3604 no change (70%), 864 change agent (17%), 535 change regimen (10%), 172 discontinue antibiotic (3%), and 10 other (0.2%). The recommendation acceptance rate was 91% (1581 cases evaluable). Infectious diseases (ID) were involved in 1466 (28%) prescriptions. With ID involvement, higher guideline-concordant empiric prescribing (64% vs 51%, p< 0.001) and regimen appropriateness (85% vs 65%, p< 0.001) was observed. ASP suggested no changes more often with ID involvement (84% versus 62%, p< 0.001). Conclusion Stepwise implementation allowed evolution and implementation of ASP processes and workflow. 30% of prescriptions audited resulted in intervention, suggesting a possible role for further education, guidelines, or restriction. ID involvement was associated with more optimal prescribing. A stepwise implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship PAF intervention is a viable strategy. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
Authors
- Carlos Cervera (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0161-1749)
- Jackson J Stewart (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0049-6192)
- Karen Doucette (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1660-9166)
- Dima Kabbani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3785-1098)
- Justin Z. Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9529-5857)
- Stephanie Smith (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4910-0083)
- Karen G Fong
- Serena Bains
- Teagan Zeggil (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1372-0918)
- Cecilia Lau
Institutions
- Alberta Health Services (CA)
- University of Alberta (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Open Forum Infectious Diseases
- Published
- 2025-01-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1979
- Primary Topic
- Antibiotic Use and Resistance
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00