P-1816. Stepwise Implementation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Prospective Audit and Feedback Intervention at a Large Academic Center in Canada

Abstract Background Effective implementation strategies for establishing antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program inpatient interventions are not well described. We describe a methodology for prospective audit and feedback (PAF) implementation at a large Canadian hospital and report its outcomes. Methods A PAF intervention targeting restricted antibiotics (carbapenems, daptomycin, linezolid, and tigecycline) was launched in March 2018. Stepwise implementation by inpatient programs was prioritized by collaboration readiness as immediate site-wide implementation was deemed unfeasible. New prescriptions were assessed by the antimicrobial stewardship team. Prescription, prescriber, intervention type, and acceptance data were collected through March 2024. Results Over a 2-year period, site wide stepwise implementation occurred in 16 discrete phases. Over the study period, 5185 prescriptions were evaluated; 3789 (73%) were empiric, and 1396 (27%) culture directed from which 3604 (70%) were optimally prescribed (evaluated by agent, regimen, and duration). Of empiric prescriptions, 636 (17%) were not guideline-concordant by indication, 1102 (29%) did not follow guidelines but was reasonable by expert opinion, and 2051 (54%) were guideline-concordant. ASP recommendations included: 3604 no change (70%), 864 change agent (17%), 535 change regimen (10%), 172 discontinue antibiotic (3%), and 10 other (0.2%). The recommendation acceptance rate was 91% (1581 cases evaluable). Infectious diseases (ID) were involved in 1466 (28%) prescriptions. With ID involvement, higher guideline-concordant empiric prescribing (64% vs 51%, p< 0.001) and regimen appropriateness (85% vs 65%, p< 0.001) was observed. ASP suggested no changes more often with ID involvement (84% versus 62%, p< 0.001). Conclusion Stepwise implementation allowed evolution and implementation of ASP processes and workflow. 30% of prescriptions audited resulted in intervention, suggesting a possible role for further education, guidelines, or restriction. ID involvement was associated with more optimal prescribing. A stepwise implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship PAF intervention is a viable strategy. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1979
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1816. Stepwise Implementation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Prospective Audit and Feedback Intervention at a Large Academic Center in Canada

Carlos Cervera, Jackson J Stewart, Karen Doucette, Dima Kabbani et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

P-1816. Stepwise Implementation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Prospective Audit and Feedback Intervention at a Large Academic Center in Canada

Carlos Cervera, Jackson J Stewart, Karen Doucette, Dima Kabbani, Justin Z. Chen, Stephanie Smith, Karen G Fong, Serena Bains, Teagan Zeggil, Cecilia Lau
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Effective implementation strategies for establishing antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program inpatient interventions are not well described. We describe a methodology for prospective audit and feedback (PAF) implementation at a large Canadian hospital and report its outcomes. Methods A PAF intervention targeting restricted antibiotics (carbapenems, daptomycin, linezolid, and tigecycline) was launched in March 2018. Stepwise implementation by inpatient programs was prioritized by collaboration readiness as immediate site-wide implementation was deemed unfeasible. New prescriptions were assessed by the antimicrobial stewardship team. Prescription, prescriber, intervention type, and acceptance data were collected through March 2024. Results Over a 2-year period, site wide stepwise implementation occurred in 16 discrete phases. Over the study period, 5185 prescriptions were evaluated; 3789 (73%) were empiric, and 1396 (27%) culture directed from which 3604 (70%) were optimally prescribed (evaluated by agent, regimen, and duration). Of empiric prescriptions, 636 (17%) were not guideline-concordant by indication, 1102 (29%) did not follow guidelines but was reasonable by expert opinion, and 2051 (54%) were guideline-concordant. ASP recommendations included: 3604 no change (70%), 864 change agent (17%), 535 change regimen (10%), 172 discontinue antibiotic (3%), and 10 other (0.2%). The recommendation acceptance rate was 91% (1581 cases evaluable). Infectious diseases (ID) were involved in 1466 (28%) prescriptions. With ID involvement, higher guideline-concordant empiric prescribing (64% vs 51%, p< 0.001) and regimen appropriateness (85% vs 65%, p< 0.001) was observed. ASP suggested no changes more often with ID involvement (84% versus 62%, p< 0.001). Conclusion Stepwise implementation allowed evolution and implementation of ASP processes and workflow. 30% of prescriptions audited resulted in intervention, suggesting a possible role for further education, guidelines, or restriction. ID involvement was associated with more optimal prescribing. A stepwise implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship PAF intervention is a viable strategy. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Alberta Health Services (CA), University of Alberta (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.