P-1493. <i>In Vitro</i> Activity of Clindamycin in Comparison with Linezolid Versus <i>Streptococcus pyogenes</i> Clinical Isolates Recovered from Patients in Manitoba, Canada

Abstract Background Clindamycin is often used in combination with a beta-lactam antimicrobial for the treatment of serious infections caused by Streptococcus pyogenes (e.g., necrotizing fasciitis, streptococcal toxic shock syndrome) due to its ability to suppress bacterial toxin synthesis. Of concern, increasing clindamycin resistance among S. pyogenes isolates has been reported in many parts of the world. The purpose of this study was to compare the in vitro activity of clindamycin with linezolid versus a contemporary Canadian collection of S. pyogenes clinical isolates. Methods S. pyogenes isolates from wounds and sterile body sites (one per patient) were obtained from three microbiology laboratories in Manitoba, Canada between December, 2022 and November, 2023. Susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution as described by CLSI, with MICs interpreted using current CLSI breakpoints. A D-test was set up for each isolate to investigate whether inducible clindamycin resistance was present. Results Susceptibility testing was performed on 140 S. pyogenes clinical isolates. The isolates were obtained from wound swabs (n = 71, 50.7%), sterile fluid/tissue samples (n = 27, 19.3%), and blood cultures (n = 42, 30.0%). All isolates were fully susceptible in vitro to penicillin and vancomycin. The proportion of isolates testing susceptible to clindamycin and linezolid was 82.9% and 100%, respectively. All of the clindamycin-resistant isolates demonstrated an inducible resistance phenotype (clindamycin MIC ≤0.12 ug/mL in all cases). Clindamycin susceptibility was similar for isolates from wound swabs (81.7%) and isolates from blood/sterile sites (84.1%). Conclusion The proportion of S. pyogenes isolates testing susceptible to clindamycin was 82.9%. All clindamycin resistant isolates demonstrated an inducible resistance phenotype. Further data are required to determine whether inducible clindamycin resistance is clinically relevant when clindamycin is used as adjunctive therapy (in combination with a beta-lactam) for serious S. pyogenes infections. All isolates tested remained susceptible to linezolid. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1663
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1493. In Vitro Activity of Clindamycin in Comparison with Linezolid Versus Streptococcus pyogenes Clinical Isolates Recovered from Patients in Manitoba, Canada

George Zhanel, J. Li, Heather J. Adam, Philippe Lagacé‐Wiens et al.
2 citations
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
2.79
article

P-1493. In Vitro Activity of Clindamycin in Comparison with Linezolid Versus Streptococcus pyogenes Clinical Isolates Recovered from Patients in Manitoba, Canada

George Zhanel, J. Li, Heather J. Adam, Philippe Lagacé‐Wiens, Andrew Walkty, Peter Pieroni, James A. Karlowsky
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Clindamycin is often used in combination with a beta-lactam antimicrobial for the treatment of serious infections caused by Streptococcus pyogenes (e.g., necrotizing fasciitis, streptococcal toxic shock syndrome) due to its ability to suppress bacterial toxin synthesis. Of concern, increasing clindamycin resistance among S. pyogenes isolates has been reported in many parts of the world. The purpose of this study was to compare the in vitro activity of clindamycin with linezolid versus a contemporary Canadian collection of S. pyogenes clinical isolates. Methods S. pyogenes isolates from wounds and sterile body sites (one per patient) were obtained from three microbiology laboratories in Manitoba, Canada between December, 2022 and November, 2023. Susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution as described by CLSI, with MICs interpreted using current CLSI breakpoints. A D-test was set up for each isolate to investigate whether inducible clindamycin resistance was present. Results Susceptibility testing was performed on 140 S. pyogenes clinical isolates. The isolates were obtained from wound swabs (n = 71, 50.7%), sterile fluid/tissue samples (n = 27, 19.3%), and blood cultures (n = 42, 30.0%). All isolates were fully susceptible in vitro to penicillin and vancomycin. The proportion of isolates testing susceptible to clindamycin and linezolid was 82.9% and 100%, respectively. All of the clindamycin-resistant isolates demonstrated an inducible resistance phenotype (clindamycin MIC ≤0.12 ug/mL in all cases). Clindamycin susceptibility was similar for isolates from wound swabs (81.7%) and isolates from blood/sterile sites (84.1%). Conclusion The proportion of S. pyogenes isolates testing susceptible to clindamycin was 82.9%. All clindamycin resistant isolates demonstrated an inducible resistance phenotype. Further data are required to determine whether inducible clindamycin resistance is clinically relevant when clindamycin is used as adjunctive therapy (in combination with a beta-lactam) for serious S. pyogenes infections. All isolates tested remained susceptible to linezolid. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Manitoba Health (CA), University of Manitoba (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
2.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.