P-1693. Comparison of Initial Treatment Strategies for Outpatients with Suspected Community Acquired-Pneumonia (CAP)

Abstract Background Initial therapies for outpatient community acquired pneumonia (CAP) remain variable based on geographic location and resistance patterns. Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines recommend either monotherapy for patients who lack comorbidities or risk factors for resistant organisms, or combination therapy for those at risk for severe pneumonia. Despite clinical guidance, it remains challenging for providers to prescribe guideline recommended therapies. Assessments of local practices and outcomes are essential for optimal CAP management. Table 1 Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) Antibiotics Regimens and Patient Characteristics Methods A retrospective review of outpatient antibiotics prescribed from 1/2023 to 3/2024 for the indication of pneumonia was conducted at a Veterans Affairs Hospital. Clinical and antibiotic data were collected and analyzed to for comorbidities, risk factors, and outcomes, and assessed for indications for monotherapy or combination therapies in concordance with current IDSA guidelines. Antibiotics assessed included amoxicillin, doxycycline, azithromycin, amoxicillin/clavulanate either as monotherapy or combination therapy (beta-lactam antibiotic + azithromycin or doxycycline). Outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. Table 2 Results A total of 169 patients were reviewed of which 103 (60%) had comorbidities or risk factors for MRSA and pseudomonas. Most common antibiotics prescribed were amoxicillin/clavulanate + azithromycin in 81 (47.9%) and amoxicillin/clavulanate in 42 (24.9%) of patient (table 1). Monotherapy was prescribed in 40.8% of patients of whom 24 (34.8%) had no comorbidities or risk factors for resistance, while combination therapy prescribed in 100 (59.2%) patients of whom 58 (56.3%) possessed risk factors for resistance (p=0.4). There were no other differences noted in the clinical characteristics, risk factors, or outcomes between the monotherapy and combination therapy group. Conclusion Antibiotic prescribing for CAP was found to be variable with low concordance with guideline recommendations for monotherapy and combination therapies. Despite variability in regimens, no differences were noted in risk factors or outcomes suggesting that regional practices dictate CAP antibiotic selection. Appropriate prescribing patterns need to be assessed by stewardship programs. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1859
Primary Topic
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1693. Comparison of Initial Treatment Strategies for Outpatients with Suspected Community Acquired-Pneumonia (CAP)

Sorabh Dhar, Sheheryar Munir, Ryan Kuhn, Suganthini Krishnan Natesan et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
article

P-1693. Comparison of Initial Treatment Strategies for Outpatients with Suspected Community Acquired-Pneumonia (CAP)

Sorabh Dhar, Sheheryar Munir, Ryan Kuhn, Suganthini Krishnan Natesan, Soonha Iqra
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Initial therapies for outpatient community acquired pneumonia (CAP) remain variable based on geographic location and resistance patterns. Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines recommend either monotherapy for patients who lack comorbidities or risk factors for resistant organisms, or combination therapy for those at risk for severe pneumonia. Despite clinical guidance, it remains challenging for providers to prescribe guideline recommended therapies. Assessments of local practices and outcomes are essential for optimal CAP management. Table 1 Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) Antibiotics Regimens and Patient Characteristics Methods A retrospective review of outpatient antibiotics prescribed from 1/2023 to 3/2024 for the indication of pneumonia was conducted at a Veterans Affairs Hospital. Clinical and antibiotic data were collected and analyzed to for comorbidities, risk factors, and outcomes, and assessed for indications for monotherapy or combination therapies in concordance with current IDSA guidelines. Antibiotics assessed included amoxicillin, doxycycline, azithromycin, amoxicillin/clavulanate either as monotherapy or combination therapy (beta-lactam antibiotic + azithromycin or doxycycline). Outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. Table 2 Results A total of 169 patients were reviewed of which 103 (60%) had comorbidities or risk factors for MRSA and pseudomonas. Most common antibiotics prescribed were amoxicillin/clavulanate + azithromycin in 81 (47.9%) and amoxicillin/clavulanate in 42 (24.9%) of patient (table 1). Monotherapy was prescribed in 40.8% of patients of whom 24 (34.8%) had no comorbidities or risk factors for resistance, while combination therapy prescribed in 100 (59.2%) patients of whom 58 (56.3%) possessed risk factors for resistance (p=0.4). There were no other differences noted in the clinical characteristics, risk factors, or outcomes between the monotherapy and combination therapy group. Conclusion Antibiotic prescribing for CAP was found to be variable with low concordance with guideline recommendations for monotherapy and combination therapies. Despite variability in regimens, no differences were noted in risk factors or outcomes suggesting that regional practices dictate CAP antibiotic selection. Appropriate prescribing patterns need to be assessed by stewardship programs. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Wayne State University (US), Detroit Medical Center (US), John D. Dingell VA Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.