Improved Growth Velocity Using a New Liquid Human Milk Fortifier in Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study

This study aimed to compare growth outcomes and tolerance among very low birth weight (VLBW) infants receiving a new, liquid human milk fortifier (LHMF-NEW) or a human milk fortifier-acidified liquid (HMF-AL).Retrospective, multicenter study of 515 VLBW infants in three regional neonatal intensive care units. The primary objective was to compare growth velocity (g/kg/d) during fortification between groups by repeated measures regression. Secondary outcomes of interest were feeding tolerance and the incidence of late-onset sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, and metabolic acidosis. Student's <i>t</i>, analysis of variance, Wilcoxon, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for numeric variables, or chi-squared and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables.No demographic differences were identified between the groups (HMF-AL, <i>n</i> = 242; LHMF-NEW, <i>n</i> = 273). Growth velocity during fortification was significantly higher in the group receiving LHMF-NEW, despite relatively similar total fluid, calorie, or protein intake (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Feeding intolerance was comparable between fortifiers. Necrotizing enterocolitis and late-onset sepsis did not differ between groups and metabolic acidosis was diagnosed less frequently with the LHMF-NEW. Anthropometric measures at discharge and length of stay were comparable.Infants receiving human milk fortified with the LHMF-NEW had faster growth velocity during fortification, similar tolerance, and less metabolic acidosis compared with an earlier cohort of infants who received human milk fortified with an HMF-AL. · Among VLBW infants, using an LHMF-NEW resulted in a faster growth velocity in weight during several weeks of fortification than using the previous HMF-AL.. · The incidence of feeding intolerance (stopping feeds >8 hour) in any given week of fortification was low and not different between groups. Also, late-onset sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis were uncommon with no differences between groups, whereas the incidence of metabolic acidosis was lower in infants receiving the LHMF-NEW.. · No differences in length of stay or anthropometrics at discharge were identified..

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Perinatology
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2527-4638
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Infant Nutrition and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improved Growth Velocity Using a New Liquid Human Milk Fortifier in Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study

Fernando Moya, Austin Gratton, Adrian Florens, Olivia Davis et al.
2 citations
American Journal of Perinatology
Infant Nutrition and Health
2.24
article

Improved Growth Velocity Using a New Liquid Human Milk Fortifier in Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study

Fernando Moya, Austin Gratton, Adrian Florens, Olivia Davis, Tiffony Blanks, Jennifer Dombrowski, Jennifer Fowler
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to compare growth outcomes and tolerance among very low birth weight (VLBW) infants receiving a new, liquid human milk fortifier (LHMF-NEW) or a human milk fortifier-acidified liquid (HMF-AL).Retrospective, multicenter study of 515 VLBW infants in three regional neonatal intensive care units. The primary objective was to compare growth velocity (g/kg/d) during fortification between groups by repeated measures regression. Secondary outcomes of interest were feeding tolerance and the incidence of late-onset sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, and metabolic acidosis. Student's <i>t</i>, analysis of variance, Wilcoxon, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for numeric variables, or chi-squared and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables.No demographic differences were identified between the groups (HMF-AL, <i>n</i> = 242; LHMF-NEW, <i>n</i> = 273). Growth velocity during fortification was significantly higher in the group receiving LHMF-NEW, despite relatively similar total fluid, calorie, or protein intake (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Feeding intolerance was comparable between fortifiers. Necrotizing enterocolitis and late-onset sepsis did not differ between groups and metabolic acidosis was diagnosed less frequently with the LHMF-NEW. Anthropometric measures at discharge and length of stay were comparable.Infants receiving human milk fortified with the LHMF-NEW had faster growth velocity during fortification, similar tolerance, and less metabolic acidosis compared with an earlier cohort of infants who received human milk fortified with an HMF-AL. · Among VLBW infants, using an LHMF-NEW resulted in a faster growth velocity in weight during several weeks of fortification than using the previous HMF-AL.. · The incidence of feeding intolerance (stopping feeds >8 hour) in any given week of fortification was low and not different between groups. Also, late-onset sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis were uncommon with no differences between groups, whereas the incidence of metabolic acidosis was lower in infants receiving the LHMF-NEW.. · No differences in length of stay or anthropometrics at discharge were identified..

American Journal of PerinatologyVol. 42(13)
University of North Carolina Wilmington (US), East Carolina University (US), John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County (US), Novant Health (US), Palm Beach Children's Hospital (US), New Hanover Regional Medical Center (US), University of Missouri Women's and Children's Hospital (US)
Mead Johnson Nutrition
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Infant Nutrition and Health
2.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.