Diagnostic efficacy of DIPSI criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in comparison with WHO 2013 criteria

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a global health issue due to its increasing prevalence and negative effects on maternal and fetal health. The standard screening method is the 75 g glucose tolerance test (OGTT), which requires fasting. The Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of India (DIPSI) suggests a one-stage, non-fasting test as an alternative, which could be more patient-friendly and aligns with international recommendations. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic efficacy of the DIPSI method compared to the WHO criteria for GDM screening. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2021 to September 2022 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka. One hundred and thirty-three singleton pregnant women who provided informed consent were included. Results: Among 133 participants, 34 (25.6%) were diagnosed with GDM according to WHO criteria, while 26 (19.5%) were diagnosed with DIPSI. The DIPSI method showed high specificity (96.97%) but lower sensitivity (67.65%) compared to the WHO criteria. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 22.32 and 0.33, respectively, with an overall accuracy of 89.46%. Lowering the DIPSI cutoff to 7.3 mmol/L improved sensitivity to 82.4% and specificity to 92.9% and increased overall accuracy to 90.2%. Conclusions: The non-fasting DIPSI method demonstrated reasonable diagnostic accuracy compared to the WHO criteria. It is recommended for use in low-resource settings but should not replace the gold standard OGTT for comprehensive GDM screening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Reproduction Contraception Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20250168
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic efficacy of DIPSI criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in comparison with WHO 2013 criteria

Tripti Rani Das, Nasrin Begum, Sharmeen Mahmood, Sumaiya Yasmin et al.
International Journal of Reproduction Contraception Obstetrics and Gynecology
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
article

Diagnostic efficacy of DIPSI criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in comparison with WHO 2013 criteria

Tripti Rani Das, Nasrin Begum, Sharmeen Mahmood, Sumaiya Yasmin, Maliha Parvin
article en

Abstract

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a global health issue due to its increasing prevalence and negative effects on maternal and fetal health. The standard screening method is the 75 g glucose tolerance test (OGTT), which requires fasting. The Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of India (DIPSI) suggests a one-stage, non-fasting test as an alternative, which could be more patient-friendly and aligns with international recommendations. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic efficacy of the DIPSI method compared to the WHO criteria for GDM screening. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2021 to September 2022 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka. One hundred and thirty-three singleton pregnant women who provided informed consent were included. Results: Among 133 participants, 34 (25.6%) were diagnosed with GDM according to WHO criteria, while 26 (19.5%) were diagnosed with DIPSI. The DIPSI method showed high specificity (96.97%) but lower sensitivity (67.65%) compared to the WHO criteria. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 22.32 and 0.33, respectively, with an overall accuracy of 89.46%. Lowering the DIPSI cutoff to 7.3 mmol/L improved sensitivity to 82.4% and specificity to 92.9% and increased overall accuracy to 90.2%. Conclusions: The non-fasting DIPSI method demonstrated reasonable diagnostic accuracy compared to the WHO criteria. It is recommended for use in low-resource settings but should not replace the gold standard OGTT for comprehensive GDM screening.

International Journal of Reproduction Contraception Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 14(2)
Bangladesh Medical University (BD), Bangladesh University of Health Sciences (BD), Dhaka Medical College and Hospital (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.