Comparative Evaluation of Osseodensification vs Conventional Osteotomy Technique on Primary and Secondary Implant Stability in Rabbit Model Split Body RCT

Primary and secondary implant stability are critical factors for successful implant treatment in clinical practice. Osseodensification demonstrates a higher insertional torque and implant stability quotient by enhancing bone density and volume surrounding implants. This enhanced stability can lead to improved osseointegration and reduced healing times, ultimately benefiting patients with compromised bone quality. How to cite this article: Arpudaswamy S, Ali SSA, Karthigeyan S, <i>et al.</i> Comparative Evaluation of Osseodensification vs Conventional Osteotomy Technique on Primary and Secondary Implant Stability in Rabbit Model Split Body RCT. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(11):1052-1059.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3751
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of Osseodensification vs Conventional Osteotomy Technique on Primary and Secondary Implant Stability in Rabbit Model Split Body RCT

Ponnanna Appanna, Rohit Shetty, Suma Karthigeyan, Sudhakar Arpudaswamy et al.
1 citations
The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
1.79
article

Comparative Evaluation of Osseodensification vs Conventional Osteotomy Technique on Primary and Secondary Implant Stability in Rabbit Model Split Body RCT

Ponnanna Appanna, Rohit Shetty, Suma Karthigeyan, Sudhakar Arpudaswamy, S. Syed Asaraf Ali, Kapila Kumar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Primary and secondary implant stability are critical factors for successful implant treatment in clinical practice. Osseodensification demonstrates a higher insertional torque and implant stability quotient by enhancing bone density and volume surrounding implants. This enhanced stability can lead to improved osseointegration and reduced healing times, ultimately benefiting patients with compromised bone quality. How to cite this article: Arpudaswamy S, Ali SSA, Karthigeyan S, <i>et al.</i> Comparative Evaluation of Osseodensification vs Conventional Osteotomy Technique on Primary and Secondary Implant Stability in Rabbit Model Split Body RCT. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(11):1052-1059.

The Journal of Contemporary Dental PracticeVol. 25(11)
Teerthanker Mahaveer University (IN), Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences and Hospital (IN), Bangalore Baptist Hospital (IN), SRM Dental College (IN), Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences (IN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
1.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Evaluation of Osseodensification vs Conventional Osteotomy Technique on Primary and Secondary Implant Stability in Rabbit Model Split Body RCT — Ponnanna Appanna, Rohit Shetty, et al. · The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS