Evaluating the precision and velocity of factory vs. handloaded lead‐free ammunition

Abstract Lead hunting bullets fragment on impact, introducing lead fragments into game meat and carrion scavenged by wildlife. In response, hunters are switching to lead‐free bullets, either voluntarily or due to local restrictions. Hunters often purchase lead‐free bullets already loaded in factory ammunition, but some prefer to handload their own. Handloading allows customization for specific rifles and the use of lead‐free projectiles not available in factory ammunition, while also potentially increasing precision, velocity, and the consistency of velocities. However, the performance advantage of handloading lead‐free ammunition remains unclear. We tested 19 rifle ammunition combinations to compare the precision and velocities of factory and handloaded ammunition, including bullets not found in factory ammunition and bullets that were commercially handloaded. Shooters fired 5 3‐shot groups for each ammunition type, which we also compiled into single 15‐shot groups. We calculated the average 3‐shot extreme spread, 3‐shot mean radius, and 15‐shot mean radius. Only 1 of 12 types of handloaded ammunition outperformed its comparison ammunition across all 3 precision metrics when using identical bullets; however, 2 bullets unavailable in factory ammunition did show greater precision ( n = 6). Handloads developed by participating shooters did not reliably shoot more consistent velocities (2 out of 13), although 69% of them achieved higher velocities. Our results suggest that factory lead‐free ammunition offers appropriate precision for big‐game hunting that can occasionally be improved by handloading.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Published
2025-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1570
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.77

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the precision and velocity of factory vs. handloaded lead‐free ammunition

Mark L. Grimes, Craig Jourdonnais, Mike Henning, Michael McTee et al.
1 citations
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Occupational Health and Performance
5.77
article

Evaluating the precision and velocity of factory vs. handloaded lead‐free ammunition

Mark L. Grimes, Craig Jourdonnais, Mike Henning, Michael McTee, Chuck Casper, Philip W. Ramsey, Ben Deeble
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Lead hunting bullets fragment on impact, introducing lead fragments into game meat and carrion scavenged by wildlife. In response, hunters are switching to lead‐free bullets, either voluntarily or due to local restrictions. Hunters often purchase lead‐free bullets already loaded in factory ammunition, but some prefer to handload their own. Handloading allows customization for specific rifles and the use of lead‐free projectiles not available in factory ammunition, while also potentially increasing precision, velocity, and the consistency of velocities. However, the performance advantage of handloading lead‐free ammunition remains unclear. We tested 19 rifle ammunition combinations to compare the precision and velocities of factory and handloaded ammunition, including bullets not found in factory ammunition and bullets that were commercially handloaded. Shooters fired 5 3‐shot groups for each ammunition type, which we also compiled into single 15‐shot groups. We calculated the average 3‐shot extreme spread, 3‐shot mean radius, and 15‐shot mean radius. Only 1 of 12 types of handloaded ammunition outperformed its comparison ammunition across all 3 precision metrics when using identical bullets; however, 2 bullets unavailable in factory ammunition did show greater precision ( n = 6). Handloads developed by participating shooters did not reliably shoot more consistent velocities (2 out of 13), although 69% of them achieved higher velocities. Our results suggest that factory lead‐free ammunition offers appropriate precision for big‐game hunting that can occasionally be improved by handloading.

Wildlife Society BulletinVol. 49(1)
University of Montana (US)
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Occupational Health and Performance
5.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating the precision and velocity of factory vs. handloaded lead‐free ammunition — Mark L. Grimes, Craig Jourdonnais, et al. · Wildlife Society Bulletin (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS