Willingness to pay for shared mobility hubs: a stated choice joint-survey in four European cities

Abstract This paper aims to assess the relative importance of different shared mobility hub design elements. A standardised survey was developed and applied among users and residents in different areas, including a stated preference experiment, to examine trade-offs between integration dimensions and the willingness-to-pay for different attributes of hubs. The results underscore a disparity between the attributes most valued by respondents and their willingness-to-pay for them, which holds significance in the planning and functioning of mobility hubs. Although elements such as information and digital integration were indicated as being prerequisites for a successful shared mobility hub, respondents are not willing to pay for it, indicating that these would have to be arranged by the government and/or transport operators. Respondents are more willing to pay for shared mobility and public transport within walking distance from one another or for placemaking strategies (such as services or landscaping), which are more evident elements related to the physical integration (and design) of hubs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Networks and Spatial Economics
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-025-09671-5
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Willingness to pay for shared mobility hubs: a stated choice joint-survey in four European cities

Karst Geurs, Anna Grigolon, Kelt Garritsen
4 citations
Networks and Spatial Economics
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
2.73
article

Willingness to pay for shared mobility hubs: a stated choice joint-survey in four European cities

Karst Geurs, Anna Grigolon, Kelt Garritsen
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper aims to assess the relative importance of different shared mobility hub design elements. A standardised survey was developed and applied among users and residents in different areas, including a stated preference experiment, to examine trade-offs between integration dimensions and the willingness-to-pay for different attributes of hubs. The results underscore a disparity between the attributes most valued by respondents and their willingness-to-pay for them, which holds significance in the planning and functioning of mobility hubs. Although elements such as information and digital integration were indicated as being prerequisites for a successful shared mobility hub, respondents are not willing to pay for it, indicating that these would have to be arranged by the government and/or transport operators. Respondents are more willing to pay for shared mobility and public transport within walking distance from one another or for placemaking strategies (such as services or landscaping), which are more evident elements related to the physical integration (and design) of hubs.

Networks and Spatial Economics
University of Twente (NL)
Joint Programming Initiative Urban Europe, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Universität für Bodenkultur Wien
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
2.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.