Improvement of rock surface roughness accuracy by combining object space resolution error and 3D point cloud features

To enhance the accuracy of joint roughness coefficient (JRC) estimation in photogrammetry, this study employed a fixed-camera shooting strategy guided by a Structure-from-Motion-based shooting parameter selection algorithm to reconstruct 3D models of rock samples at 16 different shooting distances. The analysis at profile intervals of 0.25 mm, 0.5 mm, and 1 mm revealed a strong correlation between JRC accuracy and three parameters: object space resolution error, spatial distance between point cloud points, and spatial errors of checkpoints on the orientation board. Using these three parameters as input variables and JRC error as the output variable, five machine learning algorithms—Support Vector Regression, Gaussian Process Regression, Multilayer Perceptron, XGBoost, and CatBoost—were employed to predict JRC errors across different shooting distances. The Multilayer Perceptron model performed best at profile intervals of 0.25 mm and 0.5 mm, while XGBoost was optimal at the 1 mm interval. Under the predictions of these models, JRC accuracy improved by an average of 84.7% across the three intervals. Finally, the applicability and limitations of the proposed method were further discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Earth Science
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2025.1497871
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improvement of rock surface roughness accuracy by combining object space resolution error and 3D point cloud features

Qing Wang, Wei Jiao, Qinzheng Yang, Jiang Yuan et al.
Frontiers in Earth Science
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
article

Improvement of rock surface roughness accuracy by combining object space resolution error and 3D point cloud features

Qing Wang, Wei Jiao, Qinzheng Yang, Jiang Yuan, Yongqiang Fan
article en

Abstract

To enhance the accuracy of joint roughness coefficient (JRC) estimation in photogrammetry, this study employed a fixed-camera shooting strategy guided by a Structure-from-Motion-based shooting parameter selection algorithm to reconstruct 3D models of rock samples at 16 different shooting distances. The analysis at profile intervals of 0.25 mm, 0.5 mm, and 1 mm revealed a strong correlation between JRC accuracy and three parameters: object space resolution error, spatial distance between point cloud points, and spatial errors of checkpoints on the orientation board. Using these three parameters as input variables and JRC error as the output variable, five machine learning algorithms—Support Vector Regression, Gaussian Process Regression, Multilayer Perceptron, XGBoost, and CatBoost—were employed to predict JRC errors across different shooting distances. The Multilayer Perceptron model performed best at profile intervals of 0.25 mm and 0.5 mm, while XGBoost was optimal at the 1 mm interval. Under the predictions of these models, JRC accuracy improved by an average of 84.7% across the three intervals. Finally, the applicability and limitations of the proposed method were further discussed.

Frontiers in Earth ScienceVol. 13
Chang'an University (CN), CCCC Highway Consultants (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Improvement of rock surface roughness accuracy by combining object space resolution error and 3D point cloud features — Qing Wang, Wei Jiao, et al. · Frontiers in Earth Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS