When injustice triggers retaliation: examining the dual impact of power distance orientation

Purpose This study aims to examine the relationship between organizational justice and employee retaliation. By incorporating psychological contract violation (PCV) as a mediating variable, this study uncovers the underlying psychological pathways through which perceptions of unfairness lead to employees’ decisions to retaliate. Furthermore, this study examines individual power distance orientation as a moderating factor, offering insights into how cultural values influence individual perceptions of and reactions to perceived injustice. Design/methodology/approach Through a two-wave survey design, the authors screened for full-time employees through Qualtrics. The authors have used confirmatory factor analysis to examine the measurement model fit. In addition, the authors have performed regression-based path analysis using Mplus to test their hypotheses. Findings This study has found that PCV fully mediates the impact of organizational justice on employee retention. The results also revealed two distinct mechanisms through which power distance orientation affects individual reactions to perceived unfairness. Specifically, it was also found that cognitive and motivational effects occur simultaneously yet in the opposite direction, such that power distance orientation weakens the impact of procedural justice on PCV but exacerbates the relationship between PCV and retaliation directed at supervisors and coworkers. Originality/value The analysis of the mediating role of PCV enables the authors to tease apart the cognitive and motivational impacts of power distance orientation, shedding light on existing mixed empirical findings. In addition, this study advances the understanding of psychological contract development by illustrating the impact of cultural orientation, such that it not only aligns individuals’ expectations with prevailing cultural norms but also influences the significance attributed to these expectations. Lastly, the study contributes to cross-cultural research on organizational justice and retaliation by showing individual perceptions of and reactions to lack of justice depending on cultural orientations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Conflict Management
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-04-2024-0084
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When injustice triggers retaliation: examining the dual impact of power distance orientation

Nicole J. Wilson, Guilin Zhang
4 citations
International Journal of Conflict Management
Social and Intergroup Psychology
16.81
article

When injustice triggers retaliation: examining the dual impact of power distance orientation

Nicole J. Wilson, Guilin Zhang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the relationship between organizational justice and employee retaliation. By incorporating psychological contract violation (PCV) as a mediating variable, this study uncovers the underlying psychological pathways through which perceptions of unfairness lead to employees’ decisions to retaliate. Furthermore, this study examines individual power distance orientation as a moderating factor, offering insights into how cultural values influence individual perceptions of and reactions to perceived injustice. Design/methodology/approach Through a two-wave survey design, the authors screened for full-time employees through Qualtrics. The authors have used confirmatory factor analysis to examine the measurement model fit. In addition, the authors have performed regression-based path analysis using Mplus to test their hypotheses. Findings This study has found that PCV fully mediates the impact of organizational justice on employee retention. The results also revealed two distinct mechanisms through which power distance orientation affects individual reactions to perceived unfairness. Specifically, it was also found that cognitive and motivational effects occur simultaneously yet in the opposite direction, such that power distance orientation weakens the impact of procedural justice on PCV but exacerbates the relationship between PCV and retaliation directed at supervisors and coworkers. Originality/value The analysis of the mediating role of PCV enables the authors to tease apart the cognitive and motivational impacts of power distance orientation, shedding light on existing mixed empirical findings. In addition, this study advances the understanding of psychological contract development by illustrating the impact of cultural orientation, such that it not only aligns individuals’ expectations with prevailing cultural norms but also influences the significance attributed to these expectations. Lastly, the study contributes to cross-cultural research on organizational justice and retaliation by showing individual perceptions of and reactions to lack of justice depending on cultural orientations.

International Journal of Conflict ManagementVol. 36(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
16.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.