Taxing Dividends in a Dual Income Tax System: The Nordic Experience with the Income Splitting Rules

Abstract In a dual income tax (DIT) system, labor income is taxed progressively, while capital income is subject to a lower proportional tax. DIT systems were introduced in Sweden, Norway, and Finland in the early 1990s. In the absence of rules restricting capital income distributions, owners of closely held corporations would easily be able to circumvent the progressive tax on earned income by withdrawing an appropriate amount of dividends instead of wages. The Nordic countries adopted very different income splitting models, with immediate implications for the tax treatment of dividends. In this article, I first review the principles of the income splitting rules of Sweden, Norway, and Finland. I then discuss some of the trade-offs involved in the design of such rules.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic Tax Journal
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/ntaxj-2024-0008
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Taxing Dividends in a Dual Income Tax System: The Nordic Experience with the Income Splitting Rules

Håkan Selin
Nordic Tax Journal
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
article

Taxing Dividends in a Dual Income Tax System: The Nordic Experience with the Income Splitting Rules

Håkan Selin
article en

Abstract

Abstract In a dual income tax (DIT) system, labor income is taxed progressively, while capital income is subject to a lower proportional tax. DIT systems were introduced in Sweden, Norway, and Finland in the early 1990s. In the absence of rules restricting capital income distributions, owners of closely held corporations would easily be able to circumvent the progressive tax on earned income by withdrawing an appropriate amount of dividends instead of wages. The Nordic countries adopted very different income splitting models, with immediate implications for the tax treatment of dividends. In this article, I first review the principles of the income splitting rules of Sweden, Norway, and Finland. I then discuss some of the trade-offs involved in the design of such rules.

Nordic Tax JournalVol. 2024(s1)
Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy (SE)
Riksbankens Jubileumsfond
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.