Optimizing Prostate Cancer Surgery for Seniors: Single-Port Robotic-Assisted Platform

<b><i>Background:</i></b> The Da Vinci single-port (SP) platform is being used more frequently in radical prostatectomy (RP). In this study we aimed to compare the complications and oncological outcomes of the Da Vinci SP platform in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP) between elderly and young age-groups and to further examine differences between young-old and old-old patients. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Data from 193 patients who underwent SP-RARP between December 2018 and June 2024 were analyzed. Patients were categorized into two age-groups: young (18-64 years) and elderly (65+ years). The elderly group was further divided into young-old (65-69 years) and old-old (70+ years) subgroups. The analysis considered variables related to patient characteristics, intraoperative outcomes, complications, and postoperative oncological outcomes. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The median age of the patients at the time of surgery was 64 (9.5) years. The intraoperative complication rate of 1.6%, with no cases requiring conversion to open surgery. The overall incidence of postoperative adverse events was 24.4%, and the 30-day readmission rate was 11.4%. Intraoperative complications and 30-day readmission rates were similar between groups (<i>P</i> = .593 and <i>P</i> = .821, respectively), while the postoperative complication rate was significantly higher in the younger patient group (<i>P</i> = .012). The median length of hospital stay (LOS) was 7 (22) hours and 110 (57%) patients were discharged on the same day (SDD). LOS and SDD rates were similar between groups (<i>P</i> = .389 and <i>P</i> = .529, respectively). The 3-year and 5-year biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival rates were 80.5% and 75.1%, respectively. The BCR-free survival rates were similar between both young and elderly patients and between the young-old and old-old groups (<i>P</i> = .751, <i>P</i> = .765, respectively). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> SP-RARP is a feasible option for elderly patients, delivering acceptable oncological outcomes with a low incidence of postoperative complications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0387
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Prostate Cancer Surgery for Seniors: Single-Port Robotic-Assisted Platform

Giulio Avesani, Simone Crivellaro, Luca Lambertini, Matteo Pacini et al.
2 citations
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Surgical Simulation and Training
4.01
article

Optimizing Prostate Cancer Surgery for Seniors: Single-Port Robotic-Assisted Platform

Giulio Avesani, Simone Crivellaro, Luca Lambertini, Matteo Pacini, Hakan Bahadır Haberal, Juan Ramón Torres-Anguiano, Fabio Maria Valenzi, Muhannad Aljoulani, Greta Pettenuzzo, R. Sauer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> The Da Vinci single-port (SP) platform is being used more frequently in radical prostatectomy (RP). In this study we aimed to compare the complications and oncological outcomes of the Da Vinci SP platform in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP) between elderly and young age-groups and to further examine differences between young-old and old-old patients. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Data from 193 patients who underwent SP-RARP between December 2018 and June 2024 were analyzed. Patients were categorized into two age-groups: young (18-64 years) and elderly (65+ years). The elderly group was further divided into young-old (65-69 years) and old-old (70+ years) subgroups. The analysis considered variables related to patient characteristics, intraoperative outcomes, complications, and postoperative oncological outcomes. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The median age of the patients at the time of surgery was 64 (9.5) years. The intraoperative complication rate of 1.6%, with no cases requiring conversion to open surgery. The overall incidence of postoperative adverse events was 24.4%, and the 30-day readmission rate was 11.4%. Intraoperative complications and 30-day readmission rates were similar between groups (<i>P</i> = .593 and <i>P</i> = .821, respectively), while the postoperative complication rate was significantly higher in the younger patient group (<i>P</i> = .012). The median length of hospital stay (LOS) was 7 (22) hours and 110 (57%) patients were discharged on the same day (SDD). LOS and SDD rates were similar between groups (<i>P</i> = .389 and <i>P</i> = .529, respectively). The 3-year and 5-year biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival rates were 80.5% and 75.1%, respectively. The BCR-free survival rates were similar between both young and elderly patients and between the young-old and old-old groups (<i>P</i> = .751, <i>P</i> = .765, respectively). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> SP-RARP is a feasible option for elderly patients, delivering acceptable oncological outcomes with a low incidence of postoperative complications.

Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical TechniquesVol. 35(3)
University of Pisa (IT), University of Verona (IT), Ministry of Health (TR), Humanitas University (IT), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona (IT), Ankara Atatürk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele (IT), University of Florence (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Surgical Simulation and Training
4.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.