Biases in the performance of FRAX without BMD in predicting fracture risk in a multiethnic population with diabetes: the Diabetes and Aging Study

Fracture risk calculators, such as the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), calculate the risk of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture but do not account for the excess risk of fracture in people with diabetes. We examined the predictive performance of FRAX without BMD in ethnically diverse, older patients with diabetes. Patients included were between ages 65 and 89 from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Diabetes Registry and not already taking osteoporosis medications. Race and ethnicity were self-identified. We calculated FRAX without BMD based on baseline characteristics and assessed how well FRAX predicted MOF and hip fracture over follow-up. Predictive performance was based on measures of discrimination (area under the receiver operator curve, AUC) and calibration (observed-to-predicted ratio, O/P). We identified 96 914 patients (47.0% female), of whom 5383 (5.6%) and 1767 (1.8%) had MOF and hip fracture, respectively, over a mean follow-up of 4.3 yr. The AUC for MOF and hip fracture were 0.72 and 0.77, respectively. FRAX mildly underestimated MOF and hip fracture rates (O/P 1.2 for both) overall. Discrimination was similar by race and ethnicity and diabetes duration but was worse in those over age 75 (AUC < 0.7). In some groups, there were substantial calibration errors, such as Hispanic women (O/P: 1.8 and 1.5), Black men (O/P: 1.5 and 1.8), those with duration of diabetes ≥20 yr (O/P: 1.6 and 1.5), and those over the age of 80 (O/P: 1.4 and 1.2) for MOF and hip fracture, respectively. While the discriminatory performance of FRAX without BMD was good overall in patients with diabetes, it underestimated risk in Hispanic women, Black men, those with long duration of diabetes, and in the oldest patients with diabetes. These algorithmic biases suggest that diabetes-specific tools may be needed to stratify fracture risk in patients with diabetes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmr/zjaf012
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biases in the performance of FRAX without BMD in predicting fracture risk in a multiethnic population with diabetes: the Diabetes and Aging Study

Richard W. Grant, Neda Laiteerapong, Kasia J. Lipska, Jennifer Y. Liu et al.
7 citations
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Bone health and osteoporosis research
12.05
article

Biases in the performance of FRAX without BMD in predicting fracture risk in a multiethnic population with diabetes: the Diabetes and Aging Study

Richard W. Grant, Neda Laiteerapong, Kasia J. Lipska, Jennifer Y. Liu, Joan Chia-Mei Lo, Andrew John Karter, Elbert S. Huang, Shanzay Haider, Rajesh Jain, Howard H. Moffet, Melissa M. Parker
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Fracture risk calculators, such as the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), calculate the risk of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture but do not account for the excess risk of fracture in people with diabetes. We examined the predictive performance of FRAX without BMD in ethnically diverse, older patients with diabetes. Patients included were between ages 65 and 89 from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Diabetes Registry and not already taking osteoporosis medications. Race and ethnicity were self-identified. We calculated FRAX without BMD based on baseline characteristics and assessed how well FRAX predicted MOF and hip fracture over follow-up. Predictive performance was based on measures of discrimination (area under the receiver operator curve, AUC) and calibration (observed-to-predicted ratio, O/P). We identified 96 914 patients (47.0% female), of whom 5383 (5.6%) and 1767 (1.8%) had MOF and hip fracture, respectively, over a mean follow-up of 4.3 yr. The AUC for MOF and hip fracture were 0.72 and 0.77, respectively. FRAX mildly underestimated MOF and hip fracture rates (O/P 1.2 for both) overall. Discrimination was similar by race and ethnicity and diabetes duration but was worse in those over age 75 (AUC < 0.7). In some groups, there were substantial calibration errors, such as Hispanic women (O/P: 1.8 and 1.5), Black men (O/P: 1.5 and 1.8), those with duration of diabetes ≥20 yr (O/P: 1.6 and 1.5), and those over the age of 80 (O/P: 1.4 and 1.2) for MOF and hip fracture, respectively. While the discriminatory performance of FRAX without BMD was good overall in patients with diabetes, it underestimated risk in Hispanic women, Black men, those with long duration of diabetes, and in the oldest patients with diabetes. These algorithmic biases suggest that diabetes-specific tools may be needed to stratify fracture risk in patients with diabetes.

Journal of Bone and Mineral ResearchVol. 40(4)
Kaiser Permanente (US), Chicago Department of Public Health (US), Yale University (US), University of Chicago (US), Center for Global Health (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
12.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.