Advancing Iron Ore Grade Estimation: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Ordinary Kriging

Mineral grade estimation is a vital phase in mine planning and design, as well as in the mining project’s economic assessment. In mining, commonly accepted methods of ore grade estimation include geometrical approaches and geostatistical techniques such as kriging, which effectively capture the spatial grade variation within a deposit. The application of machine-learning (ML) techniques has been explored in the estimation of mineral resources, where complex correlations need to be captured. In this paper, the authors developed four machine-learning regression models, i.e., support vector regression (SVR), random forest regression (RFR), k-nearest neighbour (KNN) regression, and extreme gradient boost (XGBoost) regression, using a geological database to predict the grade in an Indian iron ore deposit. When compared with ordinary kriging (R2 = 0.74; RMSE = 2.09), the RFR (R2 = 0.74; RMSE = 2.06), XGBoost (R2 = 0.73; RMSE = 2.12), and KNN (R2 = 0.73; RMSE = 2.11) regression models produced similar results. The block model predictions generated using the RFR, XGBoost, and KNN models show comparable accuracy and spatial trends to those of ordinary kriging, whereas SVR was identified as less effective. When integrated with geological methods, these models demonstrate significant potential for enhancing and optimizing mine planning and design processes in similar iron ore deposits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Minerals
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/min15020131
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Mineral Processing and Grinding
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing Iron Ore Grade Estimation: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Ordinary Kriging

Natsuo Okada, Mujigela Maniteja, S Vijay Shankar, Yewuhalashet Fissha et al.
12 citations
Minerals
Mineral Processing and Grinding
8.56
article

Advancing Iron Ore Grade Estimation: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Ordinary Kriging

Natsuo Okada, Mujigela Maniteja, S Vijay Shankar, Yewuhalashet Fissha, Angesom Gebretsadik, Ntshiri Batlile Tsae, Youhei Kawamura, Gopinath Samanta
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Mineral grade estimation is a vital phase in mine planning and design, as well as in the mining project’s economic assessment. In mining, commonly accepted methods of ore grade estimation include geometrical approaches and geostatistical techniques such as kriging, which effectively capture the spatial grade variation within a deposit. The application of machine-learning (ML) techniques has been explored in the estimation of mineral resources, where complex correlations need to be captured. In this paper, the authors developed four machine-learning regression models, i.e., support vector regression (SVR), random forest regression (RFR), k-nearest neighbour (KNN) regression, and extreme gradient boost (XGBoost) regression, using a geological database to predict the grade in an Indian iron ore deposit. When compared with ordinary kriging (R2 = 0.74; RMSE = 2.09), the RFR (R2 = 0.74; RMSE = 2.06), XGBoost (R2 = 0.73; RMSE = 2.12), and KNN (R2 = 0.73; RMSE = 2.11) regression models produced similar results. The block model predictions generated using the RFR, XGBoost, and KNN models show comparable accuracy and spatial trends to those of ordinary kriging, whereas SVR was identified as less effective. When integrated with geological methods, these models demonstrate significant potential for enhancing and optimizing mine planning and design processes in similar iron ore deposits.

MineralsVol. 15(2)
Indian Institute of Technology Dhanbad (IN), Akita University (JP), Hokkaido University (JP), Aksum University (ET), Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IN), Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Mineral Processing and Grinding
8.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.