Pyrite–Coal Depressants Interactions During Coal Reverse Flotation

This work investigates coal desulfurization by using reverse flotation. In this method, pyrite (the only source of sulfur in the studied coal) was separated from the meta-bituminous coal by using three different coal depressants (starch, dextrin and humic acid). A novel variable elimination approach was used to determine the contribution of the depressant type and the depressant concentration on the desulfurization performance. The results showed that the pyrite recoveries are influenced by the depressant type while the highest pyrite recovery was achieved in the presence of humic acid. Therefore, humic acid should be used in flotation rougher and scavenger cells in which the aim is to achieve high pyrite recovery. By contrast, the pyrite grades are affected significantly by the depressant concentration. Considering that the aim in flotation cleaner cells is to achieve high pyrite grade, any of the studied coal depressants can be successfully used but at high concentrations. This work demonstrated that the selection of flotation depressants depends on the type of flotation cells used in coal desulfurization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Minerals
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/min15020130
Primary Topic
Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pyrite–Coal Depressants Interactions During Coal Reverse Flotation

You Zhou, Bogale Tadesse, Sheila Devasahayam, Zijuan Xie et al.
Minerals
Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
article

Pyrite–Coal Depressants Interactions During Coal Reverse Flotation

You Zhou, Bogale Tadesse, Sheila Devasahayam, Zijuan Xie, Arturo A. García-Figueroa, Boris Albijanic, Rensheng Li
article en

Abstract

This work investigates coal desulfurization by using reverse flotation. In this method, pyrite (the only source of sulfur in the studied coal) was separated from the meta-bituminous coal by using three different coal depressants (starch, dextrin and humic acid). A novel variable elimination approach was used to determine the contribution of the depressant type and the depressant concentration on the desulfurization performance. The results showed that the pyrite recoveries are influenced by the depressant type while the highest pyrite recovery was achieved in the presence of humic acid. Therefore, humic acid should be used in flotation rougher and scavenger cells in which the aim is to achieve high pyrite recovery. By contrast, the pyrite grades are affected significantly by the depressant concentration. Considering that the aim in flotation cleaner cells is to achieve high pyrite grade, any of the studied coal depressants can be successfully used but at high concentrations. This work demonstrated that the selection of flotation depressants depends on the type of flotation cells used in coal desulfurization.

MineralsVol. 15(2)
Central South University (CN), Curtin University (AU), China University of Mining and Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Government of Jiangsu Province, Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pyrite–Coal Depressants Interactions During Coal Reverse Flotation — You Zhou, Bogale Tadesse, et al. · Minerals (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS