„Jocul de-a naţionalismul” Raportul istoricului Aleksei Şeviakov despre noul curs din istoriografia şi politica românească a anilor 1960

Between December 1968 and February 1969, the Soviet historian Aleksei A. Sheviakov conducted a research visit to Romania. After returning to Moscow, he wrote a critical report on the new nationalist trends that had emerged since the early 1960s in Romanian historiography, as well as in the broader political context of the regime in Bucharest. Among the most "dangerous" aspects, he noted the return to the "bourgeois" positions of the interwar period, which supported the unity of the Romanian state achieved in 1918 and rejected the Cominternist theses that viewed Romania as an imperialist state that had forcefully occupied the territories of other countries, including Bessarabia, which was considered "Soviet." The report also has the significant merit of detailing the "healthy forces" in Romania that opposed the nationalist course, instead supporting the internationalist positions of Moscow and the other countries in the Soviet bloc.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ARHIVELE TOTALITARISMULUI
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61232/at.2024.3-4.16
Primary Topic
Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

„Jocul de-a naţionalismul” Raportul istoricului Aleksei Şeviakov despre noul curs din istoriografia şi politica românească a anilor 1960

Vasile Buga, Dan Cătănuș
ARHIVELE TOTALITARISMULUI
Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
article

„Jocul de-a naţionalismul” Raportul istoricului Aleksei Şeviakov despre noul curs din istoriografia şi politica românească a anilor 1960

Vasile Buga, Dan Cătănuș
article en

Abstract

Between December 1968 and February 1969, the Soviet historian Aleksei A. Sheviakov conducted a research visit to Romania. After returning to Moscow, he wrote a critical report on the new nationalist trends that had emerged since the early 1960s in Romanian historiography, as well as in the broader political context of the regime in Bucharest. Among the most "dangerous" aspects, he noted the return to the "bourgeois" positions of the interwar period, which supported the unity of the Romanian state achieved in 1918 and rejected the Cominternist theses that viewed Romania as an imperialist state that had forcefully occupied the territories of other countries, including Bessarabia, which was considered "Soviet." The report also has the significant merit of detailing the "healthy forces" in Romania that opposed the nationalist course, instead supporting the internationalist positions of Moscow and the other countries in the Soviet bloc.

ARHIVELE TOTALITARISMULUIVol. 32(3-4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

„Jocul de-a naţionalismul” Raportul istoricului Aleksei Şeviakov despre noul curs din istoriografia şi politica românească a anilor 1960 — Vasile Buga, Dan Cătănuș · ARHIVELE TOTALITARISMULUI (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS