Groups with elements of order 8 do not have the DCI property

Let k be odd, and n an odd multiple of 3. Although this can also be deduced from known results, we provide a new proof that Ck ⋊ C₈ and (Cn × C₃) ⋊ C₈ do not have the Directed Cayley Isomorphism (DCI) property. When k is prime, Ck ⋊ C₈ had previously been proved to have the Cayley Isomorphism (CI) property. To the best of our knowledge, the groups Cp ⋊ C₈ (where p is an odd prime) are only the second known infinite family of groups that have the CI property but do not have the DCI property. This also provides a new proof of the result (which follows from known results but was not explicitly published) that no group with an element of order 8 has the DCI property. One piece of our proof is a new result that may prove to be of independent interest: we show that if a permutation group has a regularsubgroup of index 2 then it must be 2-closed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Art of Discrete and Applied Mathematics
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26493/2590-9770.1549.3cb
Primary Topic
Finite Group Theory Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Groups with elements of order 8 do not have the DCI property

Joy Morris, Pablo Spiga, Ted Dobson
The Art of Discrete and Applied Mathematics
Finite Group Theory Research
article

Groups with elements of order 8 do not have the DCI property

Joy Morris, Pablo Spiga, Ted Dobson
article en

Abstract

Let k be odd, and n an odd multiple of 3. Although this can also be deduced from known results, we provide a new proof that Ck ⋊ C₈ and (Cn × C₃) ⋊ C₈ do not have the Directed Cayley Isomorphism (DCI) property. When k is prime, Ck ⋊ C₈ had previously been proved to have the Cayley Isomorphism (CI) property. To the best of our knowledge, the groups Cp ⋊ C₈ (where p is an odd prime) are only the second known infinite family of groups that have the CI property but do not have the DCI property. This also provides a new proof of the result (which follows from known results but was not explicitly published) that no group with an element of order 8 has the DCI property. One piece of our proof is a new result that may prove to be of independent interest: we show that if a permutation group has a regularsubgroup of index 2 then it must be 2-closed.

The Art of Discrete and Applied MathematicsVol. 8(2)
University of Lethbridge (CA), University of Primorska (SI), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Finite Group Theory Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Groups with elements of order 8 do not have the DCI property — Joy Morris, Pablo Spiga, et al. · The Art of Discrete and Applied Mathematics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS