Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Risk Management in Quality Management Systems

This study addresses risk management in quality management systems by analyzing risk prioritization using the multi-criteria methods Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The primary objective was to identify and evaluate key risks, considering emerging factors such as climate change, to strengthen organizational resilience in the long term. A panel of 42 experts prioritized the following risk typologies: (i) geopolitical, (ii) economic, (iii) social, (iv) technological, and (v) environmental. The results revealed an increase in the importance of geopolitical and economic risks for 2024 compared to 2020, while technological and environmental risks decreased. Additionally, risks were projected over the next 10 years, highlighting extreme climate events and biodiversity loss as the most relevant for 2034. The findings emphasize the need for a proactive approach to risk management, aligned with ISO 9001:2015 standards and its recent climate change amendment published in 2024, to adapt organizational strategies for a constantly evolving global environment and ensure long-term sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031092
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Quality and Management Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
20.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Risk Management in Quality Management Systems

Asier Ibeas, Eliana Judith Yazo-Cabuya, Rossanna Rey-Caballero
9 citations
Sustainability
Quality and Management Systems
20.04
article

Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Risk Management in Quality Management Systems

Asier Ibeas, Eliana Judith Yazo-Cabuya, Rossanna Rey-Caballero
article en
9 citations

Abstract

This study addresses risk management in quality management systems by analyzing risk prioritization using the multi-criteria methods Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The primary objective was to identify and evaluate key risks, considering emerging factors such as climate change, to strengthen organizational resilience in the long term. A panel of 42 experts prioritized the following risk typologies: (i) geopolitical, (ii) economic, (iii) social, (iv) technological, and (v) environmental. The results revealed an increase in the importance of geopolitical and economic risks for 2024 compared to 2020, while technological and environmental risks decreased. Additionally, risks were projected over the next 10 years, highlighting extreme climate events and biodiversity loss as the most relevant for 2034. The findings emphasize the need for a proactive approach to risk management, aligned with ISO 9001:2015 standards and its recent climate change amendment published in 2024, to adapt organizational strategies for a constantly evolving global environment and ensure long-term sustainability.

SustainabilityVol. 17(3)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano (CO), Universidad Santo Tomás (CO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Quality and Management Systems
20.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.