The 2020 Heatwave Led to a Larger Enhancement in Annual Gross Primary Production in West Siberia Than in East Siberia

Abstract Spring and summer vegetation productivity in Siberia shows opposing responses to warmer spring. Spring warming causes excessive vegetation growth and earlier start of photosynthesis, enhancing productivity in spring. However, this leads to reduced productivity in the following season (i.e., summer) through soil moisture depletion. To understand how an exceptional spring heatwave (HW) affected ecosystem carbon uptake, we investigated the spatiotemporal cascade of gross primary production (GPP) and multiple climate variables over Siberia in 2020, using a satellite‐retrieved GPP product (GOSIF‐GPP) and the ERA5‐Land reanalysis data set for 2001–2020. Results showed a positive impact of anomalous spring warming on annual GPP (GPP ann ). GPP ann from GOSIF‐GPP in West Siberia (55°–70°N, 50°–90°E) was enhanced by up to 10% above the 2001–2019 average despite continued dry conditions from May to August. In East Siberia (55–70°N, 90–130°E), the GPP increases for May and June were sufficient to compensate for marked reduction of GPP in July due to negative anomaly in radiation. In addition, the higher sensitivity of GPP ann to spring temperature in West Siberia than in East Siberia suggests that GPP increase coupled with strong warming and respective excessive vegetation growth might be more pronounced in the western region, as observed in 2020. Our results indicate that the warming trend in spring, combined with possible extreme heat events, could elevate annual carbon uptake in Siberia, particularly in West Siberia. Further, this case study for the extreme HW event that occurred in 2020 can provide useful insight for understanding future change in carbon uptake over Siberia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jg008487
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The 2020 Heatwave Led to a Larger Enhancement in Annual Gross Primary Production in West Siberia Than in East Siberia

Sang Seo Park, Chang‐Eui Park, Jingfeng Xiao, Jin‐Soo Kim et al.
3 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
Climate variability and models
3.32
article

The 2020 Heatwave Led to a Larger Enhancement in Annual Gross Primary Production in West Siberia Than in East Siberia

Sang Seo Park, Chang‐Eui Park, Jingfeng Xiao, Jin‐Soo Kim, Eun‐Ji Song, D. S. Seo, Sung‐Bin Park
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Spring and summer vegetation productivity in Siberia shows opposing responses to warmer spring. Spring warming causes excessive vegetation growth and earlier start of photosynthesis, enhancing productivity in spring. However, this leads to reduced productivity in the following season (i.e., summer) through soil moisture depletion. To understand how an exceptional spring heatwave (HW) affected ecosystem carbon uptake, we investigated the spatiotemporal cascade of gross primary production (GPP) and multiple climate variables over Siberia in 2020, using a satellite‐retrieved GPP product (GOSIF‐GPP) and the ERA5‐Land reanalysis data set for 2001–2020. Results showed a positive impact of anomalous spring warming on annual GPP (GPP ann ). GPP ann from GOSIF‐GPP in West Siberia (55°–70°N, 50°–90°E) was enhanced by up to 10% above the 2001–2019 average despite continued dry conditions from May to August. In East Siberia (55–70°N, 90–130°E), the GPP increases for May and June were sufficient to compensate for marked reduction of GPP in July due to negative anomaly in radiation. In addition, the higher sensitivity of GPP ann to spring temperature in West Siberia than in East Siberia suggests that GPP increase coupled with strong warming and respective excessive vegetation growth might be more pronounced in the western region, as observed in 2020. Our results indicate that the warming trend in spring, combined with possible extreme heat events, could elevate annual carbon uptake in Siberia, particularly in West Siberia. Further, this case study for the extreme HW event that occurred in 2020 can provide useful insight for understanding future change in carbon uptake over Siberia.

Journal of Geophysical Research BiogeosciencesVol. 130(2)
University of New Hampshire (US), City University of Hong Kong (HK), Kongju National University (KR), Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (KR), Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KR), Pukyong National University (KR)
National Science Foundation, National Research Foundation, Ministry of Environment, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Education, India, Korea Environmental Industry and Technology Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Climate variability and models
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.