PAIN AND CATASTROPHIZING LEVELS IN TRACK AND FIELD ATHLETES ACCORDING TO THEIR EVENT SPECIALIZATION: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY.

This study examined pain and catastrophizing in 124 track and field athletes, considering training characteristics and sex. Due to high physical demands, athletes often cope with pain, though its impact on performance was previously unexamined. During the preseason, 124 athletes responded an anonymous questionnaire to collect information about their socio-demographic (sex, age) and sports characteristics (volume training, event specialization, sport experience). Also, they informed about current pain (from 0 to 10 level, and location), and replied to the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS). Injuries from the previous season were also collected. From all participants, 35 athletes (28.2%) had current pain, mainly in the knee (18.6%) and ankle (16.3%), with higher prevalence in explosive event athletes (p = 0.041). Athletes with pain had higher training volumes (p = 0.007) and PCS values (p < 0.001). The average catastrophizing level was 14.52 ± 9.85 points, correlating with pain (r = 0.36, p < 0.001) and age (r = 0.25, p = 0.006). Female athletes reported higher helplessness scores than males (p = 0.011). In conclusion, one third of athletes affirmed to have pain, mainly in knee and ankle. Athletes specialized in explosive events seems to experience more current pain than endurance. Furthermore, volume of training could facilitate pain existence. Catastrophizing was related with age and pain, regardless the athletic event. Also, female athletes had higher values of helplessness than male athletes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sport and Health Research
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58727/jshr.108258
Primary Topic
Sports injuries and prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PAIN AND CATASTROPHIZING LEVELS IN TRACK AND FIELD ATHLETES ACCORDING TO THEIR EVENT SPECIALIZATION: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY.

Andreu Sastre‐Munar, Nicolò Franco
Journal of Sport and Health Research
Sports injuries and prevention
article

PAIN AND CATASTROPHIZING LEVELS IN TRACK AND FIELD ATHLETES ACCORDING TO THEIR EVENT SPECIALIZATION: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY.

Andreu Sastre‐Munar, Nicolò Franco
article en

Abstract

This study examined pain and catastrophizing in 124 track and field athletes, considering training characteristics and sex. Due to high physical demands, athletes often cope with pain, though its impact on performance was previously unexamined. During the preseason, 124 athletes responded an anonymous questionnaire to collect information about their socio-demographic (sex, age) and sports characteristics (volume training, event specialization, sport experience). Also, they informed about current pain (from 0 to 10 level, and location), and replied to the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS). Injuries from the previous season were also collected. From all participants, 35 athletes (28.2%) had current pain, mainly in the knee (18.6%) and ankle (16.3%), with higher prevalence in explosive event athletes (p = 0.041). Athletes with pain had higher training volumes (p = 0.007) and PCS values (p < 0.001). The average catastrophizing level was 14.52 ± 9.85 points, correlating with pain (r = 0.36, p < 0.001) and age (r = 0.25, p = 0.006). Female athletes reported higher helplessness scores than males (p = 0.011). In conclusion, one third of athletes affirmed to have pain, mainly in knee and ankle. Athletes specialized in explosive events seems to experience more current pain than endurance. Furthermore, volume of training could facilitate pain existence. Catastrophizing was related with age and pain, regardless the athletic event. Also, female athletes had higher values of helplessness than male athletes.

Journal of Sport and Health ResearchVol. 17(1)
Universitat de les Illes Balears (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Sports injuries and prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

PAIN AND CATASTROPHIZING LEVELS IN TRACK AND FIELD ATHLETES ACCORDING TO THEIR EVENT SPECIALIZATION: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY. — Andreu Sastre‐Munar, Nicolò Franco · Journal of Sport and Health Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS