The Institute of Corporate Traditions in the Management of a Russian Company

The article is devoted to the study of the institution of “corporate traditions” – a set of rules that is increasingly actively used by arbitration courts, which are not explicitly provided for by Russian legislation, but appeal to the actually formed algorithms for making decisions on the management of a company. The author attempted to find answers to the following questions. In which segments of company management is the role of corporate traditions most significant, which can be relied upon when building a strategy and tactics for confronting an opponent during a conflict? What are the social and regulatory features of this phenomenon? What place does it occupy in the system of domestic corporate governance institutions? Can it be applied by investors and members of management bodies “out of court”? The article examines corporate traditions of management of Russian companies, evaluates the use of corporate traditions in an out-of-court context, and considers the social and regulatory features of corporate traditions. The key segments in which corporate traditions play an important role are identified: distribution relations, key transactions, decision-making procedures, corporate behavior of participants in management relations. The study also emphasizes the role of estoppel in corporate governance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Modern Competition
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37791/2687-0657-2024-18-6-51-67
Primary Topic
Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Institute of Corporate Traditions in the Management of a Russian Company

Oleg V. Osipenko
Journal of Modern Competition
Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies
article

The Institute of Corporate Traditions in the Management of a Russian Company

Oleg V. Osipenko
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the institution of “corporate traditions” – a set of rules that is increasingly actively used by arbitration courts, which are not explicitly provided for by Russian legislation, but appeal to the actually formed algorithms for making decisions on the management of a company. The author attempted to find answers to the following questions. In which segments of company management is the role of corporate traditions most significant, which can be relied upon when building a strategy and tactics for confronting an opponent during a conflict? What are the social and regulatory features of this phenomenon? What place does it occupy in the system of domestic corporate governance institutions? Can it be applied by investors and members of management bodies “out of court”? The article examines corporate traditions of management of Russian companies, evaluates the use of corporate traditions in an out-of-court context, and considers the social and regulatory features of corporate traditions. The key segments in which corporate traditions play an important role are identified: distribution relations, key transactions, decision-making procedures, corporate behavior of participants in management relations. The study also emphasizes the role of estoppel in corporate governance.

Journal of Modern CompetitionVol. 18(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Institute of Corporate Traditions in the Management of a Russian Company — Oleg V. Osipenko · Journal of Modern Competition (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS