Understanding the complexity of centers for teaching and learning: introducing a four-dimensional model

Abstract Centers for Teaching and Learning (CTLs) are gaining visibility in the higher education landscape as key actors that support universities in providing high-quality education and fostering a culture that values teaching and learning. While existing research on CTLs typically focuses on evaluation, impact, or institutionally context-specific work, we sought to unearth a framework that could be universally applied to understanding CTL work and functionality. Following data collection and 25 interviews with CTL Directors from higher education institutions across the USA, we created an integrative approach that brings together organizational, behavioral, and relational perspectives. The four dimensions—governance, identity, social capital, and activities—enable us to investigate CTLs from various angles and at different levels, providing valuable clues for understanding CTL performance and challenges. This integrative model can also be used as a framework to inform CTL design decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Higher Education
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-025-01399-y
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the complexity of centers for teaching and learning: introducing a four-dimensional model

Amber Dailey‐Hebert, Simon Beausaert, Alexandra Mihai
2 citations
Higher Education
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
5.52
article

Understanding the complexity of centers for teaching and learning: introducing a four-dimensional model

Amber Dailey‐Hebert, Simon Beausaert, Alexandra Mihai
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Centers for Teaching and Learning (CTLs) are gaining visibility in the higher education landscape as key actors that support universities in providing high-quality education and fostering a culture that values teaching and learning. While existing research on CTLs typically focuses on evaluation, impact, or institutionally context-specific work, we sought to unearth a framework that could be universally applied to understanding CTL work and functionality. Following data collection and 25 interviews with CTL Directors from higher education institutions across the USA, we created an integrative approach that brings together organizational, behavioral, and relational perspectives. The four dimensions—governance, identity, social capital, and activities—enable us to investigate CTLs from various angles and at different levels, providing valuable clues for understanding CTL performance and challenges. This integrative model can also be used as a framework to inform CTL design decisions.

Higher EducationVol. 90(6)
Maastricht University (NL), Park University (US), Department of Education (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
5.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Understanding the complexity of centers for teaching and learning: introducing a four-dimensional model — Amber Dailey‐Hebert, Simon Beausaert, et al. · Higher Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS