Intricacies of human–AI interaction in dynamic decision-making for precision oncology

AI decision support systems can assist clinicians in planning adaptive treatment strategies that can dynamically react to individuals' cancer progression for effective personalized care. However, AI's imperfections can lead to suboptimal therapeutics if clinicians over or under rely on AI. To investigate such collaborative decision-making process, we conducted a Human-AI interaction study on response-adaptive radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma. We investigated two levels of collaborative behavior: model-agnostic and model-specific; and found that Human-AI interaction is multifactorial and depends on the complex interrelationship between prior knowledge and preferences, patient's state, disease site, treatment modality, model transparency, and AI's learned behavior and biases. In summary, some clinicians may disregard AI recommendations due to skepticism; others will critically analyze AI recommendations on a case-by-case basis; clinicians will adjust their decisions if they find AI recommendations beneficial to patients; and clinician will disregard AI recommendations if deemed harmful or suboptimal and seek alternatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-55259-x
Citations
27
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
66.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intricacies of human–AI interaction in dynamic decision-making for precision oncology

Brian D. Gonzalez, Sean R. Miller, Issam El Naqa, Dipesh Niraula et al.
27 citations
Nature Communications
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
66.99
article

Intricacies of human–AI interaction in dynamic decision-making for precision oncology

Brian D. Gonzalez, Sean R. Miller, Issam El Naqa, Dipesh Niraula, Russell F. Palm, Yi Luo, Jessica M. Frakes, Anupam Rishi, Samuel N. Regan, Martha M. Matuszak, Randall K. Ten Haken, Ya-Yu Tsai, Ivo D. Dinov, Matthew N. Mills, Alex K. Bryant, Jamalina Jamaluddin, Michael Dykstra, Javier F. Torres–Roca, Kyle Clifford Cuneo, Jionghua Jin, Casey Liveringhouse, Thomas J. Dilling
article en
27 citations

Abstract

AI decision support systems can assist clinicians in planning adaptive treatment strategies that can dynamically react to individuals' cancer progression for effective personalized care. However, AI's imperfections can lead to suboptimal therapeutics if clinicians over or under rely on AI. To investigate such collaborative decision-making process, we conducted a Human-AI interaction study on response-adaptive radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma. We investigated two levels of collaborative behavior: model-agnostic and model-specific; and found that Human-AI interaction is multifactorial and depends on the complex interrelationship between prior knowledge and preferences, patient's state, disease site, treatment modality, model transparency, and AI's learned behavior and biases. In summary, some clinicians may disregard AI recommendations due to skepticism; others will critically analyze AI recommendations on a case-by-case basis; clinicians will adjust their decisions if they find AI recommendations beneficial to patients; and clinician will disregard AI recommendations if deemed harmful or suboptimal and seek alternatives.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 16(1)
University of Michigan (US), Moffitt Cancer Center (US), VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (US)
U.S. Department of Defense, Novocure, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
66.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.