Regional Equity and Fiscal Decentralization: Which States Stay Robust During the Economic Downturn?

Location and level of government are critical factors that promise statewide economic growth. While existing research is prone to focus on the role that the factors consistently contribute to growth, there is limited understanding of how the structural varieties of geographical concentrations and decentralization could be effective during economic crises. Based on data from 29 OECD countries between 2000 and 2019, this study finds mixed empirical findings. First, the result shows the degree of concentration standing for regional inequity per se has adverse effects on the growth, while allowing states to withstand economic crises, having a modest decline. Second, oppositely, the fiscal decentralization rapidly enhances nationwide economic growth but is prone to experience far more losses than its less decentralized counterparts. The patterns point out some limited application of both regional equity and fiscal decentralization for economic development, leaving an implication that local governance may be differently managed in consideration of economic shocks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52152/23.1.140-161(2025)
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regional Equity and Fiscal Decentralization: Which States Stay Robust During the Economic Downturn?

Ji Min Park, HyungGun Park, Hyung Jun Park
Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
article

Regional Equity and Fiscal Decentralization: Which States Stay Robust During the Economic Downturn?

Ji Min Park, HyungGun Park, Hyung Jun Park
article en

Abstract

Location and level of government are critical factors that promise statewide economic growth. While existing research is prone to focus on the role that the factors consistently contribute to growth, there is limited understanding of how the structural varieties of geographical concentrations and decentralization could be effective during economic crises. Based on data from 29 OECD countries between 2000 and 2019, this study finds mixed empirical findings. First, the result shows the degree of concentration standing for regional inequity per se has adverse effects on the growth, while allowing states to withstand economic crises, having a modest decline. Second, oppositely, the fiscal decentralization rapidly enhances nationwide economic growth but is prone to experience far more losses than its less decentralized counterparts. The patterns point out some limited application of both regional equity and fiscal decentralization for economic development, leaving an implication that local governance may be differently managed in consideration of economic shocks.

Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government
National Assembly (KR), Sungkyunkwan University (KR), Myongji University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.