The Discourse on the Marxist Study of Religion in the New Era in the PRC: An Outsider’s Perspective

This paper contributes to the intercultural understanding of religious studies in East Asia by examining their discursive framework within the Chinese context. It analyzes the academic discourse on religious studies in the PRC, particularly debates on atheism and the Marxist study of religion. In 2021, President Xi Jinping emphasized the importance of aligning religious studies with Marxist principles, sparking renewed debate on the field’s orientation. This paper examines the responses of religious studies scholars to state directives. It illustrates how the reframing of the discipline and reinterpretations of the Marxist view on religion serve as strategies employed by scholars to answer “the call” of the official discourse. The significant representation of scholars promoting atheism in the political sphere further aligns religious studies with official discourse, narrowing the discursive space for other theoretical approaches toward religion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Religions
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16020156
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Discourse on the Marxist Study of Religion in the New Era in the PRC: An Outsider’s Perspective

Katja Wengenmayr
2 citations
Religions
Chinese history and philosophy
8.40
article

The Discourse on the Marxist Study of Religion in the New Era in the PRC: An Outsider’s Perspective

Katja Wengenmayr
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper contributes to the intercultural understanding of religious studies in East Asia by examining their discursive framework within the Chinese context. It analyzes the academic discourse on religious studies in the PRC, particularly debates on atheism and the Marxist study of religion. In 2021, President Xi Jinping emphasized the importance of aligning religious studies with Marxist principles, sparking renewed debate on the field’s orientation. This paper examines the responses of religious studies scholars to state directives. It illustrates how the reframing of the discipline and reinterpretations of the Marxist view on religion serve as strategies employed by scholars to answer “the call” of the official discourse. The significant representation of scholars promoting atheism in the political sphere further aligns religious studies with official discourse, narrowing the discursive space for other theoretical approaches toward religion.

ReligionsVol. 16(2)
Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN), Leipzig University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Chinese history and philosophy
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Discourse on the Marxist Study of Religion in the New Era in the PRC: An Outsider’s Perspective — Katja Wengenmayr · Religions (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS