Factors influencing underrepresented geoscientists' decisions to accept or decline faculty job offers in the US

Abstract Many geoscience departments in the United States (US) are working to recruit faculty from underrepresented groups. However, there is little information about how hiring practices are perceived by candidates. Here we address this gap by interviewing 19 geoscientists who identify as an underrepresented race, ethnicity, or gender who recently declined a tenure-track faculty job offer in the US about their faculty job searches, with an emphasis on their decisions to accept or decline an offer. We find that many participants experienced hiring practices inconsistent with existing recommendations to increase faculty diversity, and some participants were subject to uncivilized, even potentially discriminatory, practices. Therefore, we leverage our results to provide actionable recommendations for improving faculty recruitment efforts. We highlight that departments may doubly benefit from improving their culture: in addition to benefiting current members, it may also help with recruitment. Overall, our findings emphasize the need for continued evaluation of faculty hiring practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Earth & Environment
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02052-3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors influencing underrepresented geoscientists' decisions to accept or decline faculty job offers in the US

Christopher D. Wirz, Meghana Ranganathan, Mara Freilich, Lyssa M. Freese et al.
1 citations
Communications Earth & Environment
Career Development and Diversity
2.37
article

Factors influencing underrepresented geoscientists' decisions to accept or decline faculty job offers in the US

Christopher D. Wirz, Meghana Ranganathan, Mara Freilich, Lyssa M. Freese, Liza Yasemin Barnes, Ellen Lalk, Julia Wilcots, Margaret L. Duffy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Many geoscience departments in the United States (US) are working to recruit faculty from underrepresented groups. However, there is little information about how hiring practices are perceived by candidates. Here we address this gap by interviewing 19 geoscientists who identify as an underrepresented race, ethnicity, or gender who recently declined a tenure-track faculty job offer in the US about their faculty job searches, with an emphasis on their decisions to accept or decline an offer. We find that many participants experienced hiring practices inconsistent with existing recommendations to increase faculty diversity, and some participants were subject to uncivilized, even potentially discriminatory, practices. Therefore, we leverage our results to provide actionable recommendations for improving faculty recruitment efforts. We highlight that departments may doubly benefit from improving their culture: in addition to benefiting current members, it may also help with recruitment. Overall, our findings emphasize the need for continued evaluation of faculty hiring practices.

Communications Earth & EnvironmentVol. 6(1)
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), Planetary Science Institute (US), Carnegie Institution for Science (US), Princeton University (US), Brown University (US), University of Chicago (US), NSF NCAR Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Drexel University (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
National Science Foundation, Carnegie Institution of Washington, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, University of California, San Diego, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Climate Program Office
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Career Development and Diversity
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.