Accuracy of remote, video-based supraventricular tachycardia detection in patients undergoing elective electrical cardioversion: a prospective cohort

Unobtrusive pulse rate monitoring by continuous video recording, based on remote photoplethysmography (rPPG), might enable early detection of perioperative arrhythmias in general ward patients. However, the accuracy of an rPPG-based machine learning model to monitor the pulse rate during sinus rhythm and arrhythmias is unknown. We conducted a prospective, observational diagnostic study in a cohort with a high prevalence of arrhythmias (patients undergoing elective electrical cardioversion). Pulse rate was assessed with rPPG via a visible light camera and ECG as reference, before and after cardioversion. A cardiologist categorized ECGs into normal sinus rhythm or arrhythmias requiring further investigation. A supervised machine learning model (support vector machine with Gaussian kernel) was trained using rPPG signal features from 60-s intervals and validated via leave-one-subject-out. Pulse rate measurement performance was evaluated with Bland-Altman analysis. Of 72 patients screened, 51 patients were included in the analyses, including 444 60-s intervals with normal sinus rhythm and 1130 60-s intervals of clinically relevant arrhythmias. The model showed robust discrimination (AUC 0.95 [0.93-0.96]) and good calibration. For pulse rate measurement, the bias and limits of agreement for sinus rhythm were 1.21 [- 8.60 to 11.02], while for arrhythmia, they were - 7.45 [- 35.75 to 20.86]. The machine learning model accurately identified sinus rhythm and arrhythmias using rPPG in real-world conditions. Heart rate underestimation during arrhythmias highlights the need for optimization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01263-5
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of remote, video-based supraventricular tachycardia detection in patients undergoing elective electrical cardioversion: a prospective cohort

Rik van Esch, Leon Montenij, Svitlana Zinger, R. Arthur Bouwman et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
1.35
article

Accuracy of remote, video-based supraventricular tachycardia detection in patients undergoing elective electrical cardioversion: a prospective cohort

Rik van Esch, Leon Montenij, Svitlana Zinger, R. Arthur Bouwman, Sander Stuijk, J.W.M. Bergmans, Bas C. T. van Bussel, Iris Cramer, Carla Kloeze, Marcel van ’t Veer, Cindy Verstappen, Lukas Dekker
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Unobtrusive pulse rate monitoring by continuous video recording, based on remote photoplethysmography (rPPG), might enable early detection of perioperative arrhythmias in general ward patients. However, the accuracy of an rPPG-based machine learning model to monitor the pulse rate during sinus rhythm and arrhythmias is unknown. We conducted a prospective, observational diagnostic study in a cohort with a high prevalence of arrhythmias (patients undergoing elective electrical cardioversion). Pulse rate was assessed with rPPG via a visible light camera and ECG as reference, before and after cardioversion. A cardiologist categorized ECGs into normal sinus rhythm or arrhythmias requiring further investigation. A supervised machine learning model (support vector machine with Gaussian kernel) was trained using rPPG signal features from 60-s intervals and validated via leave-one-subject-out. Pulse rate measurement performance was evaluated with Bland-Altman analysis. Of 72 patients screened, 51 patients were included in the analyses, including 444 60-s intervals with normal sinus rhythm and 1130 60-s intervals of clinically relevant arrhythmias. The model showed robust discrimination (AUC 0.95 [0.93-0.96]) and good calibration. For pulse rate measurement, the bias and limits of agreement for sinus rhythm were 1.21 [- 8.60 to 11.02], while for arrhythmia, they were - 7.45 [- 35.75 to 20.86]. The machine learning model accurately identified sinus rhythm and arrhythmias using rPPG in real-world conditions. Heart rate underestimation during arrhythmias highlights the need for optimization.

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and ComputingVol. 39(5)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), Catharina Ziekenhuis (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Dutch Cardiovascular Alliance, ZonMw, Hartstichting, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.