P-2045. Humoral Response induced by Three-Dose Vaccination Schemes Against SARS-CoV-2 in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: Experience from a Middle-Income Country

Abstract Background Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) recipients are at high risk for severe COVID-19, requiring effective vaccination strategies. SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccines elicit lower levels of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) compared to mRNA vaccines and have been little studied in immunocompromised children. However, low- and middle-income countries predominantly use inactivated vaccines. Aim: to explore the immunogenicity of different COVID-19 vaccination strategies in pediatric HSCT recipients from Chile, where both vaccine types are used. Methods Multicenter cross-sectional study of pediatric HSCT recipients, previously immunized with 3-dose regimens based on CoronaVac/Sinovac (CV) and BNT162b2/Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT) vaccines >=3 months post-transplant. NAbs against the original Wuhan strain and the Omicron XBB1.5 variant were evaluated 8-12 weeks after the 3rd dose using a pseudovirus-based assay. A positive Nab titer was defined as a neutralizing activity of at least 50% (ID50) at a 1:160 dilution. Safety/reactogenicity outcomes were recorded. Results 27 pediatric HSCT recipients were included (median age 11.9 y), of whom 21 were vaccinated with 2 doses of CV followed by a BNT booster, 1 with 2 doses of BNT followed by a CV booster and 5 with 3 BNT doses. At 11.1 weeks (IQR 9.2-13.6) after the 3rd dose, 84% reached NAb positivity for the Wuhan strain, while only 40% reached it for the XBB1.5 variant (P< 0.005). Neutralizing capacity was higher against Wuhan compared to XBB1.5, with a median ID50 of 2127 vs 75.9 (P< 0.0001). NAb-positive patients for the Wuhan strain had higher IgG levels (median 693 mg/dL vs 371.5 mg/dL in non-responders, P< 0.05). No significant differences were found in neutralizing capacity based on the scheme administered. In a multivariate linear regression, the CD19 count predicted neutralization capacity. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion No differences were observed in neutralizing capacity based on the vaccines administered, supporting the use of heterologous schemes including both inactivated and mRNA vaccines in HSCT pediatric recipients. Neutralizing capacity was higher against Wuhan than XBB1.5, emphasizing the importance of booster doses of bivalent vaccines that target this variant. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.2201
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-2045. Humoral Response induced by Three-Dose Vaccination Schemes Against SARS-CoV-2 in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: Experience from a Middle-Income Country

Marie-Hélène Corre, Constanza Martínez-Valdebenito, Juan Pablo Torres, Andrés Soffia et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
article

P-2045. Humoral Response induced by Three-Dose Vaccination Schemes Against SARS-CoV-2 in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: Experience from a Middle-Income Country

Marie-Hélène Corre, Constanza Martínez-Valdebenito, Juan Pablo Torres, Andrés Soffia, P Donoso, Aldo Barrera, Paula Catalán, Natalia González, M Cecilia Vizcaya
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) recipients are at high risk for severe COVID-19, requiring effective vaccination strategies. SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccines elicit lower levels of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) compared to mRNA vaccines and have been little studied in immunocompromised children. However, low- and middle-income countries predominantly use inactivated vaccines. Aim: to explore the immunogenicity of different COVID-19 vaccination strategies in pediatric HSCT recipients from Chile, where both vaccine types are used. Methods Multicenter cross-sectional study of pediatric HSCT recipients, previously immunized with 3-dose regimens based on CoronaVac/Sinovac (CV) and BNT162b2/Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT) vaccines >=3 months post-transplant. NAbs against the original Wuhan strain and the Omicron XBB1.5 variant were evaluated 8-12 weeks after the 3rd dose using a pseudovirus-based assay. A positive Nab titer was defined as a neutralizing activity of at least 50% (ID50) at a 1:160 dilution. Safety/reactogenicity outcomes were recorded. Results 27 pediatric HSCT recipients were included (median age 11.9 y), of whom 21 were vaccinated with 2 doses of CV followed by a BNT booster, 1 with 2 doses of BNT followed by a CV booster and 5 with 3 BNT doses. At 11.1 weeks (IQR 9.2-13.6) after the 3rd dose, 84% reached NAb positivity for the Wuhan strain, while only 40% reached it for the XBB1.5 variant (P< 0.005). Neutralizing capacity was higher against Wuhan compared to XBB1.5, with a median ID50 of 2127 vs 75.9 (P< 0.0001). NAb-positive patients for the Wuhan strain had higher IgG levels (median 693 mg/dL vs 371.5 mg/dL in non-responders, P< 0.05). No significant differences were found in neutralizing capacity based on the scheme administered. In a multivariate linear regression, the CD19 count predicted neutralization capacity. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion No differences were observed in neutralizing capacity based on the vaccines administered, supporting the use of heterologous schemes including both inactivated and mRNA vaccines in HSCT pediatric recipients. Neutralizing capacity was higher against Wuhan than XBB1.5, emphasizing the importance of booster doses of bivalent vaccines that target this variant. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), Metropolitan University of Educational Sciences (CL), Hospital Luis Calvo Mackenna (CL), Metropolitan University of Technology (CL), University of Chile (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.