P-2048. COVID-19 XBB.1.5 Vaccine Uptake Based on State Vaccine Registries Compared to National Survey Data

Abstract Background Prior to May 11, 2023, all COVID-19 vaccinations were required to be reported by states to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In the post-pandemic era, national vaccination uptake is now estimated using the National Immunization Survey (NIS). While survey methodology attempts to achieve random sampling of the population and accurate assessment of vaccine use through self-report, it is unknown how these estimates compare to state vaccine registries. We aimed to compare estimated COVID-19 vaccine uptake during the 2023-2024 season from state vaccine registries with estimates from the NIS.Figure 1.Uptake of XBB.1.5 COVID-19 vaccine in state vaccine registries versus national survey estimates, September 2023 - February 2024 Methods We utilized two COVID-19 state vaccination registries where COVID-19 vaccine reporting was required: CAIR2 in California and LINKS in Louisiana. We identified COVID-19 XBB.1.5-adapted vaccines administered between September 11, 2023, and February 10, 2024, using CVX vaccine codes 308 - 313. California and Louisiana 2023 population estimates were obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau and used as the denominator to calculate population-level uptake. For the same time period, state-specific COVID-19 vaccine uptake estimates were also obtained from state-specific NIS data for California and Louisiana as a comparison. Results At the end of the study period, 14.4% of adults and 5.6% of children in California were documented as vaccinated in the CAIR2 registry compared to NIS estimates that 23.8% (1.6x) of adults and 17.3% (3.1x) of children in California had been XBB.1.5 vaccinated (Figure). For Louisiana, 5.4% of adults and 0.6% of children were found in LINKS registry data compared to NIS estimates that 12.3% (2.3x) of adults and 3.9% (6.5x) of children were XBB.1.5 vaccinated. Conclusion XBB vaccination coverage was low overall but was substantially lower when measured using state vaccine registry data compared with national survey data, especially for children. Efforts to improve COVID-19 vaccination are warranted, as are future studies to determine why COVID-19 uptake appears higher in national survey data compared to what is captured in state registries. Disclosures Angela Cook, MS, Pfizer: Employee|Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Kathleen M. Andersen, PhD MSc, Pfizer Inc.: Employee|Pfizer Inc.: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Matthew A. Brouillette, MPH, Pfizer Inc.: Employee|Pfizer Inc.: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Leah McGrath, PhD, Pfizer Inc.: Employee|Pfizer Inc.: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) John M. McLaughlin, PhD, Pfizer: Employee|Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.2204
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-2048. COVID-19 XBB.1.5 Vaccine Uptake Based on State Vaccine Registries Compared to National Survey Data

Leah J. McGrath, Kathleen M. Andersen, John M. McLaughlin, Angela Cook et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

P-2048. COVID-19 XBB.1.5 Vaccine Uptake Based on State Vaccine Registries Compared to National Survey Data

Leah J. McGrath, Kathleen M. Andersen, John M. McLaughlin, Angela Cook, Matthew Brouillette
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Prior to May 11, 2023, all COVID-19 vaccinations were required to be reported by states to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In the post-pandemic era, national vaccination uptake is now estimated using the National Immunization Survey (NIS). While survey methodology attempts to achieve random sampling of the population and accurate assessment of vaccine use through self-report, it is unknown how these estimates compare to state vaccine registries. We aimed to compare estimated COVID-19 vaccine uptake during the 2023-2024 season from state vaccine registries with estimates from the NIS.Figure 1.Uptake of XBB.1.5 COVID-19 vaccine in state vaccine registries versus national survey estimates, September 2023 - February 2024 Methods We utilized two COVID-19 state vaccination registries where COVID-19 vaccine reporting was required: CAIR2 in California and LINKS in Louisiana. We identified COVID-19 XBB.1.5-adapted vaccines administered between September 11, 2023, and February 10, 2024, using CVX vaccine codes 308 - 313. California and Louisiana 2023 population estimates were obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau and used as the denominator to calculate population-level uptake. For the same time period, state-specific COVID-19 vaccine uptake estimates were also obtained from state-specific NIS data for California and Louisiana as a comparison. Results At the end of the study period, 14.4% of adults and 5.6% of children in California were documented as vaccinated in the CAIR2 registry compared to NIS estimates that 23.8% (1.6x) of adults and 17.3% (3.1x) of children in California had been XBB.1.5 vaccinated (Figure). For Louisiana, 5.4% of adults and 0.6% of children were found in LINKS registry data compared to NIS estimates that 12.3% (2.3x) of adults and 3.9% (6.5x) of children were XBB.1.5 vaccinated. Conclusion XBB vaccination coverage was low overall but was substantially lower when measured using state vaccine registry data compared with national survey data, especially for children. Efforts to improve COVID-19 vaccination are warranted, as are future studies to determine why COVID-19 uptake appears higher in national survey data compared to what is captured in state registries. Disclosures Angela Cook, MS, Pfizer: Employee|Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Kathleen M. Andersen, PhD MSc, Pfizer Inc.: Employee|Pfizer Inc.: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Matthew A. Brouillette, MPH, Pfizer Inc.: Employee|Pfizer Inc.: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Leah McGrath, PhD, Pfizer Inc.: Employee|Pfizer Inc.: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) John M. McLaughlin, PhD, Pfizer: Employee|Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company)

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Pfizer (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.