How Well Do AMIP6 and CMIP6 Reproduce the Specific Extreme El Niño Teleconnections to North America?

Abstract Extreme El Niño events (e.g., 1982–1983, 1997–1998) are characterized by strong, eastward‐shifted warm Sea Surface Temperature anomalies, and a southward migration of the eastern Pacific Inter‐Tropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) to the equator. Using an ensemble simulation with a single AMIP6 model, Beniche et al. (2024, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598‐024‐52580‐9 ) suggested that such events uniquely yield an eastward shift of the Pacific‐North American (PNA) teleconnection pattern, with specific impacts over North America. Here, we first examine the robustness of these results in 135 ensemble members from 23 different AMIP6 models. The specific, eastward‐shifted extreme El Niño teleconnection pattern is robust in all models but one. It is also highly reproducible across years and ensemble members, due to stronger teleconnection amplitude than that of internal atmospheric noise. This yields specific, predictable impacts (defined as 0.5 STD) such as warm conditions over Northeast America (69% chances), and wet anomalies over California (77%) and Florida (97%). We then show that 26 out of the 42 CMIP6 models we examined reproduce extreme El Niño events, defined as El Niño events associated with large eastern Pacific rainfall anomalies. These models tend to have a weaker cold tongue bias than the rest of CMIP6. Despite a degradation in performance from AMIP6 to CMIP6, 18 out of the 26 selected models capture the specific extreme El Niño teleconnections, albeit with some underestimation of wet anomalies over California and Florida. We end by discussing implications for future North American climate projections based on CMIP6.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jd041740
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Well Do AMIP6 and CMIP6 Reproduce the Specific Extreme El Niño Teleconnections to North America?

Jérôme Vialard, Nicholas M. J. Hall, Margot Beniche, Matthieu Lengaigne
2 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Climate variability and models
2.21
article

How Well Do AMIP6 and CMIP6 Reproduce the Specific Extreme El Niño Teleconnections to North America?

Jérôme Vialard, Nicholas M. J. Hall, Margot Beniche, Matthieu Lengaigne
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Extreme El Niño events (e.g., 1982–1983, 1997–1998) are characterized by strong, eastward‐shifted warm Sea Surface Temperature anomalies, and a southward migration of the eastern Pacific Inter‐Tropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) to the equator. Using an ensemble simulation with a single AMIP6 model, Beniche et al. (2024, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598‐024‐52580‐9 ) suggested that such events uniquely yield an eastward shift of the Pacific‐North American (PNA) teleconnection pattern, with specific impacts over North America. Here, we first examine the robustness of these results in 135 ensemble members from 23 different AMIP6 models. The specific, eastward‐shifted extreme El Niño teleconnection pattern is robust in all models but one. It is also highly reproducible across years and ensemble members, due to stronger teleconnection amplitude than that of internal atmospheric noise. This yields specific, predictable impacts (defined as 0.5 STD) such as warm conditions over Northeast America (69% chances), and wet anomalies over California (77%) and Florida (97%). We then show that 26 out of the 42 CMIP6 models we examined reproduce extreme El Niño events, defined as El Niño events associated with large eastern Pacific rainfall anomalies. These models tend to have a weaker cold tongue bias than the rest of CMIP6. Despite a degradation in performance from AMIP6 to CMIP6, 18 out of the 26 selected models capture the specific extreme El Niño teleconnections, albeit with some underestimation of wet anomalies over California and Florida. We end by discussing implications for future North American climate projections based on CMIP6.

Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresVol. 130(3)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Ifremer (FR), Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Laboratoire d’Études en Géophysique et Océanographie Spatiales (FR), Marine Biodiversity Exploitation and Conservation (FR), Laboratoire d'Océanographie et du Climat : Expérimentations et Approches Numériques (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Life below water, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Climate variability and models
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.