P-1633. Evaluating an Urgent Care Antibiotic Stewardship Intervention: A Multi-Network Collaborative Effort

Abstract Background Urgent care centers (UCCs) have previously been associated with high rates of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing without supporting appropriate diagnoses. Prior antibiotic stewardship studies in urgent care settings have generally been limited to pediatric clinics and diagnoses or conducted within single urgent care networks. Broadly generalizable stewardship efforts targeting common diagnoses across ages are needed. Methods This quality improvement study's participants were UCC clinicians from a national collaborative of 49 UCCs in 27 networks across 18 states within the United States. Stewardship interventions included signing of a commitment statement, and a choice of intervention options to implement during two plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles during the intervention period. The primary outcome was the percent of urgent care encounters (from randomly selected patient charts) for viral illness or bronchitis diagnoses with inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, stratified by whether the clinician was a direct participant in the quality improvement study and by diagnosis. A 3-month baseline and 9-month intervention period were compared using an interrupted time series with a generalized estimating equation model. Results 15,588 patient encounters were included with a diagnosis of bronchitis or viral illness. The intervention was associated with a 39% relative decrease in inappropriate antibiotic prescribing (aOR=0.61, 95%CI 0.48-0.77) among participating clinicians compared to baseline. The intervention did not result in a significant change in inappropriate antibiotic prescribing (aOR=1.08, p=0.54) for clinicians who did not directly participate. Conclusion This antibiotic stewardship intervention was associated with significant reductions in inappropriate prescribing among clinicians who directly participated. Implementing stewardship interventions in UCCs may reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions for common diagnoses; however, direct clinician participation may be necessary, especially in settings with high rates of clinician turnover. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1799
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1633. Evaluating an Urgent Care Antibiotic Stewardship Intervention: A Multi-Network Collaborative Effort

Rana F. Hamdy, AA Roberts, Patrick Dolan, Daniel E. Park et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

P-1633. Evaluating an Urgent Care Antibiotic Stewardship Intervention: A Multi-Network Collaborative Effort

Rana F. Hamdy, AA Roberts, Patrick Dolan, Daniel E. Park, Cindy H. Liu, Sabrina Balthrop
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Urgent care centers (UCCs) have previously been associated with high rates of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing without supporting appropriate diagnoses. Prior antibiotic stewardship studies in urgent care settings have generally been limited to pediatric clinics and diagnoses or conducted within single urgent care networks. Broadly generalizable stewardship efforts targeting common diagnoses across ages are needed. Methods This quality improvement study's participants were UCC clinicians from a national collaborative of 49 UCCs in 27 networks across 18 states within the United States. Stewardship interventions included signing of a commitment statement, and a choice of intervention options to implement during two plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles during the intervention period. The primary outcome was the percent of urgent care encounters (from randomly selected patient charts) for viral illness or bronchitis diagnoses with inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, stratified by whether the clinician was a direct participant in the quality improvement study and by diagnosis. A 3-month baseline and 9-month intervention period were compared using an interrupted time series with a generalized estimating equation model. Results 15,588 patient encounters were included with a diagnosis of bronchitis or viral illness. The intervention was associated with a 39% relative decrease in inappropriate antibiotic prescribing (aOR=0.61, 95%CI 0.48-0.77) among participating clinicians compared to baseline. The intervention did not result in a significant change in inappropriate antibiotic prescribing (aOR=1.08, p=0.54) for clinicians who did not directly participate. Conclusion This antibiotic stewardship intervention was associated with significant reductions in inappropriate prescribing among clinicians who directly participated. Implementing stewardship interventions in UCCs may reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions for common diagnoses; however, direct clinician participation may be necessary, especially in settings with high rates of clinician turnover. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Milken Institute (US), Children's National (US), George Washington University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.