P-2281. Impact of Immunosuppression on Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Pneumonia Patients

Abstract Background Nosocomial lower respiratory infections (nLRTI) are linked to poorer clinical outcomes and a significant healthcare cost. Nevertheless, there remains uncertainty regarding the risk factors for mortality among critically ill individuals, particularly those with varying degrees of immunosuppression. Thus, this study aims to comprehensively describe immunocompromised patients, assess its impact on clinical outcomes, and conduct a comparative survival analysis. Figure 1 Identified microorganisms in A) the Immunosuppression group and B) Non- the Immunosuppression group Methods This analysis used data from the prospective, multicenter, and multinational cohort developed by the European Network for ICU-related respiratory infections (ENIRRI), including 1060 adult patients diagnosed with nLRTI. Descriptive statistics were utilized to compare the immunosuppressed group against the non-immunosuppressed group, while also detailing the microorganisms predominantly identified in both groups. A survival analysis adjusted for infection severity using a Cox proportional hazards model was performed to explore mortality within these subgroups further. Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier survival curve stratified by Immunosuppression status: Probability of survival from ICU admission Results Immunosuppression was observed in 25% of the patients (264/1060). In both cohorts, Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the predominant microorganism, particularly affecting immunosuppressed patients, (25.3% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.032), followed by Klebsiella spp and Acinetobacter baumanii (Figure 1). Interestingly, the survival analysis revealed a lower probability of survival in the non-immunosuppressed after admission to the ICU (Figure 2). Additionally, the Cox regression analysis adjusted by disease severity found that no-immunosuppressed patients had lower mortality. Figure 3 Adjusted Kaplan-Meier Survival Curve following Cox Regression: Survival Probability Adjusted for SAPS II Score. Conclusion This description sheds light on the intricate relationship between immunosuppression, microbial etiology, and clinical outcomes in patients with nLRTI. Interestingly, immunosuppression was not associated with worse clinical outcomes, even after adjusting for disease severity. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.2434
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-2281. Impact of Immunosuppression on Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Pneumonia Patients

Luis Felipe Reyes, Ignacio Martín‐Loeches, Antoní Torres, Natalia Sanabria-Herrera
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
article

P-2281. Impact of Immunosuppression on Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Pneumonia Patients

Luis Felipe Reyes, Ignacio Martín‐Loeches, Antoní Torres, Natalia Sanabria-Herrera
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Nosocomial lower respiratory infections (nLRTI) are linked to poorer clinical outcomes and a significant healthcare cost. Nevertheless, there remains uncertainty regarding the risk factors for mortality among critically ill individuals, particularly those with varying degrees of immunosuppression. Thus, this study aims to comprehensively describe immunocompromised patients, assess its impact on clinical outcomes, and conduct a comparative survival analysis. Figure 1 Identified microorganisms in A) the Immunosuppression group and B) Non- the Immunosuppression group Methods This analysis used data from the prospective, multicenter, and multinational cohort developed by the European Network for ICU-related respiratory infections (ENIRRI), including 1060 adult patients diagnosed with nLRTI. Descriptive statistics were utilized to compare the immunosuppressed group against the non-immunosuppressed group, while also detailing the microorganisms predominantly identified in both groups. A survival analysis adjusted for infection severity using a Cox proportional hazards model was performed to explore mortality within these subgroups further. Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier survival curve stratified by Immunosuppression status: Probability of survival from ICU admission Results Immunosuppression was observed in 25% of the patients (264/1060). In both cohorts, Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the predominant microorganism, particularly affecting immunosuppressed patients, (25.3% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.032), followed by Klebsiella spp and Acinetobacter baumanii (Figure 1). Interestingly, the survival analysis revealed a lower probability of survival in the non-immunosuppressed after admission to the ICU (Figure 2). Additionally, the Cox regression analysis adjusted by disease severity found that no-immunosuppressed patients had lower mortality. Figure 3 Adjusted Kaplan-Meier Survival Curve following Cox Regression: Survival Probability Adjusted for SAPS II Score. Conclusion This description sheds light on the intricate relationship between immunosuppression, microbial etiology, and clinical outcomes in patients with nLRTI. Interestingly, immunosuppression was not associated with worse clinical outcomes, even after adjusting for disease severity. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Universidad de La Sabana (CO), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), St. James's Hospital (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.